Diagnostic and safety value of ultrasound-guided transthoracic core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a single-center experience.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultraschall in Der Medizin Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2511-5757
Paolo Poisa, Paolo Malerba, Anna Orsini, Linda Sabbadini, Maria Grazia De Tavonatti, Stefania Cecchinel, Paola Orizio, Stefano Caletti, Erkin Saeed Saifi, Matteo Nardin, Giovanni Pelizzari
{"title":"Diagnostic and safety value of ultrasound-guided transthoracic core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a single-center experience.","authors":"Paolo Poisa, Paolo Malerba, Anna Orsini, Linda Sabbadini, Maria Grazia De Tavonatti, Stefania Cecchinel, Paola Orizio, Stefano Caletti, Erkin Saeed Saifi, Matteo Nardin, Giovanni Pelizzari","doi":"10.1055/a-2511-5757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>US-guided (Ultrasound-guided) percutaneous transthoracic core needle biopsy (CNB) is a favorable method for establishing the correct diagnosis of mediastinal masses. However, studies in this area are scant and often include small samples, thus making it difficult to provide robust evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this procedure. Thus, we aimed to report on the 20 years of experience at our center with regard to US-guided CNB.We included all consecutive patients referred to our center to undergo US-guided percutaneous transthoracic CNB for a mediastinal mass between 1999 and 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to display data. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to inquire about predictors of diagnostic sampling.The final cohort included 140 patients with a median age of 37 years. In 20.7% of the cases, the mediastinal mass was an incidental finding. The parasternal approach was used most often. US-guided CNB was diagnostic in 84.3% of the patients and most of the diagnoses included hematological neoplasms. The reasons for non-diagnostic sampling included firm lesion consistency, low quantity of samples, and lesion necrosis. The parasternal approach resulted in an independent predictor of diagnostic sampling (AOR 4.16, 95% CI 1.14-15.23, p=0.031), while a bulky feature revealed only a trend for diagnostic sampling. One non-severe adverse event occurred, with spontaneous resolution.US-guided percutaneous transthoracic CNB is an effective and safe procedure that allows the diagnosis of mediastinal masses. The identification of patients that could benefit from this technique should be the next step in researching this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":"186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2511-5757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

US-guided (Ultrasound-guided) percutaneous transthoracic core needle biopsy (CNB) is a favorable method for establishing the correct diagnosis of mediastinal masses. However, studies in this area are scant and often include small samples, thus making it difficult to provide robust evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of this procedure. Thus, we aimed to report on the 20 years of experience at our center with regard to US-guided CNB.We included all consecutive patients referred to our center to undergo US-guided percutaneous transthoracic CNB for a mediastinal mass between 1999 and 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to display data. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to inquire about predictors of diagnostic sampling.The final cohort included 140 patients with a median age of 37 years. In 20.7% of the cases, the mediastinal mass was an incidental finding. The parasternal approach was used most often. US-guided CNB was diagnostic in 84.3% of the patients and most of the diagnoses included hematological neoplasms. The reasons for non-diagnostic sampling included firm lesion consistency, low quantity of samples, and lesion necrosis. The parasternal approach resulted in an independent predictor of diagnostic sampling (AOR 4.16, 95% CI 1.14-15.23, p=0.031), while a bulky feature revealed only a trend for diagnostic sampling. One non-severe adverse event occurred, with spontaneous resolution.US-guided percutaneous transthoracic CNB is an effective and safe procedure that allows the diagnosis of mediastinal masses. The identification of patients that could benefit from this technique should be the next step in researching this topic.

超声引导下纵隔肿块经胸穿刺活检的诊断和安全价值:单中心经验。
超声引导下经皮经胸穿刺活检(CNB)是正确诊断纵隔肿块的良好方法。然而,在这一领域的研究很少,而且通常只包括小样本,因此很难提供关于该程序安全性和有效性的有力证据。因此,我们的目的是报告我们中心在美国指导的CNB方面20年的经验。我们纳入了所有在1999年至2022年间连续转诊到我们中心接受美国引导下经皮经胸CNB治疗纵隔肿块的患者。使用描述性统计来显示数据。采用多元逻辑回归分析探讨诊断抽样的预测因素。最终队列包括140例患者,中位年龄为37岁。20.7%的病例中,纵隔肿块是偶然发现的。最常采用胸骨旁入路。84.3%的患者诊断出了美国引导的CNB,大多数诊断包括血液学肿瘤。非诊断性取样的原因包括病灶一致性强、样本量少、病灶坏死。胸骨旁入路是诊断抽样的独立预测因子(AOR 4.16, 95% CI 1.14-15.23, p=0.031),而大体积特征仅显示诊断抽样的趋势。发生1例非严重不良事件,自行消退。超声引导下经皮经胸CNB是一种有效且安全的诊断纵隔肿块的方法。确定可以从这项技术中受益的患者应该是研究这一主题的下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信