Exploring the lacrimal sac fossa: anatomical insights for optimizing external dacryocystorhinostomy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Ozden Bedre Duygu, Figen Govsa, Yelda Pinar, Zulal Oner
{"title":"Exploring the lacrimal sac fossa: anatomical insights for optimizing external dacryocystorhinostomy.","authors":"Ozden Bedre Duygu, Figen Govsa, Yelda Pinar, Zulal Oner","doi":"10.1007/s00276-025-03586-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External dacryocystorhinostomy is considered the gold standard for treating epiphora resulting from nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Despite the success of the procedure, a visible facial skin scar often undermines the surgical outcome. The aim of this study is to prevent visible facial scarring following oculoplastic interventions by improving the insight into the anatomical details of the lacrimal sac fossa (LSF), lacrimo-maxillary suture (LMS), periosteum, and lacrimal diaphragm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined the medial canthal region of eighty adult male sspecimens to investigate the landmarks associated with the LSF. The periorbital area was dissected to reveal the skin, subcutaneous tissues, orbicularis oculi muscles, and the lacrimal drainage system, all of which were detached from their bony attachments. The lengths of the lacrimal crests, midline length, midline width, dorsolateral angle, composition of the LMS, and area of the LSF were evaluated using the ImageJ program. The LSF was categorized into six distinct shapes: ellipsoid, oval, inverted pear, straight pear, oblique hammer, and quadrangular.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The measurements of the anterior lacrimal crest averaged 2.2 ± 0.4 cm, the posterior edge 2.0 ± 0.4 cm, and the midline 1.9 ± 0.3 cm. The area of the LSF was found to be 1.4 ± 0.5 cm². The analysis reveals that about half of the LSF consists of equal parts maxillary and lacrimal bones. The dorsolateral angle values where the maxilla and os lacrimale equally contributed to the structure of the LSF were higher than those completely formed by the maxilla. The shapes of the LSF were classified as ellipsoid (35%), oblique hammer (21.3%), oval (13.7%), inverted pear (15%), with the ellipsoid type being the most frequent. The anterior lacrimal crest length of the oval-shaped LSF was shorter than that of the oblique hammer-shaped LSF. Similarly, the posterior lacrimal crest of the oval-shaped LSF was shorter than that of the oblique hammer-shaped LSF. The midline length of ellipsoid, oval, and inverted pear-shaped LSFs was shorter than that of oblique hammer-shaped LSFs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The length of anterior lacrimal crest and LMS are suggested as the most reliable navigational references for locating the type of LSF. Mastery of the transversal and vertical orientation of the LSF is essential for surgeons performing oculoplastic surgeries tailored to individual anatomical variations. This study is clinically valuable as it underscores the necessity for oculoplastic surgeons to adapt surgical techniques in response to anatomical differences encountered during surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49461,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":"47 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-025-03586-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: External dacryocystorhinostomy is considered the gold standard for treating epiphora resulting from nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Despite the success of the procedure, a visible facial skin scar often undermines the surgical outcome. The aim of this study is to prevent visible facial scarring following oculoplastic interventions by improving the insight into the anatomical details of the lacrimal sac fossa (LSF), lacrimo-maxillary suture (LMS), periosteum, and lacrimal diaphragm.

Methods: The study examined the medial canthal region of eighty adult male sspecimens to investigate the landmarks associated with the LSF. The periorbital area was dissected to reveal the skin, subcutaneous tissues, orbicularis oculi muscles, and the lacrimal drainage system, all of which were detached from their bony attachments. The lengths of the lacrimal crests, midline length, midline width, dorsolateral angle, composition of the LMS, and area of the LSF were evaluated using the ImageJ program. The LSF was categorized into six distinct shapes: ellipsoid, oval, inverted pear, straight pear, oblique hammer, and quadrangular.

Results: The measurements of the anterior lacrimal crest averaged 2.2 ± 0.4 cm, the posterior edge 2.0 ± 0.4 cm, and the midline 1.9 ± 0.3 cm. The area of the LSF was found to be 1.4 ± 0.5 cm². The analysis reveals that about half of the LSF consists of equal parts maxillary and lacrimal bones. The dorsolateral angle values where the maxilla and os lacrimale equally contributed to the structure of the LSF were higher than those completely formed by the maxilla. The shapes of the LSF were classified as ellipsoid (35%), oblique hammer (21.3%), oval (13.7%), inverted pear (15%), with the ellipsoid type being the most frequent. The anterior lacrimal crest length of the oval-shaped LSF was shorter than that of the oblique hammer-shaped LSF. Similarly, the posterior lacrimal crest of the oval-shaped LSF was shorter than that of the oblique hammer-shaped LSF. The midline length of ellipsoid, oval, and inverted pear-shaped LSFs was shorter than that of oblique hammer-shaped LSFs.

Conclusion: The length of anterior lacrimal crest and LMS are suggested as the most reliable navigational references for locating the type of LSF. Mastery of the transversal and vertical orientation of the LSF is essential for surgeons performing oculoplastic surgeries tailored to individual anatomical variations. This study is clinically valuable as it underscores the necessity for oculoplastic surgeons to adapt surgical techniques in response to anatomical differences encountered during surgery.

探索泪囊窝:优化外部泪囊鼻腔造口术的解剖学见解。
背景:外部泪囊鼻腔造瘘术被认为是治疗鼻泪管阻塞引起的泪漏的金标准。尽管手术成功,但明显的面部皮肤疤痕往往会影响手术效果。本研究的目的是通过提高对泪囊窝(LSF)、泪颌缝合(LMS)、骨膜和泪膈的解剖细节的了解,防止眼整形手术后可见的面部瘢痕形成。方法:对80例成年男性的内眦区域进行检查,探讨与LSF相关的标志。解剖眶周区域,发现皮肤、皮下组织、眼轮匝肌和泪道引流系统,所有这些都与骨附着体分离。采用ImageJ软件对泪冠长度、中线长度、中线宽度、背外侧角、泪嵴组成及泪嵴面积进行评价。LSF分为六种不同的形状:椭球形、椭圆形、倒梨形、直梨形、斜锤形和四边形。结果:泪嵴前径平均为2.2±0.4 cm,后缘平均为2.0±0.4 cm,中线平均为1.9±0.3 cm。LSF的面积为1.4±0.5 cm²。分析表明,大约一半的上颌骨和泪骨组成相等。上颌和泪口对LSF结构贡献均等的背外侧角值高于完全由上颌形成的背外侧角值。LSF的形状分为椭球型(35%)、斜锤型(21.3%)、椭圆形(13.7%)、倒梨型(15%),其中以椭球型最为常见。卵圆形泪嵴前嵴长度比斜锤状泪嵴前嵴短。同样,卵圆形泪嵴后嵴短于斜锤状泪嵴后嵴。椭球形、椭圆形和倒梨形lsf的中线长度比斜锤形lsf短。结论:泪前嵴长度和LMS可作为定位LSF类型的最可靠的导航参考。掌握LSF的横向和垂直方向对于外科医生根据个体解剖变化进行眼部整形手术至关重要。这项研究具有临床价值,因为它强调了眼科整形外科医生根据手术中遇到的解剖差异调整手术技术的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信