Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care workers on solid medical waste management in two urban hospitals of Bangladesh: a mixed-method study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Md Tauhidul Islam, Md Abdur Rafi, Mohammad Jahid Hasan
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude and practice of health care workers on solid medical waste management in two urban hospitals of Bangladesh: a mixed-method study.","authors":"Md Tauhidul Islam, Md Abdur Rafi, Mohammad Jahid Hasan","doi":"10.1186/s41043-025-00748-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proper management of solid medical waste is a crucial component of an efficient healthcare system. The objective of the present study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of medical waste management among the healthcare workers of two selected hospitals of Dhaka city of Bangladesh.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, mixed-method study was conducted in two tertiary care hospitals of Dhaka, Bangladesh-icddr, b Dhaka hospital (Private) and Dhaka Shishu hospital (Public) during November, 2011. A number of 138 healthcare professionals (29 doctors, 80 nurses and 29 cleaners) participated in the study. The study had three parts of data collection: (i) survey with health care workers to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and practices about medical waste management; (ii) in-depth interviews with health officials of infection control committee; and (iii) observation using a facility checklist to determine the current practice of medical waste management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, participants from IDH had better knowledge, and practice regarding solid medical waste management compared to DSH. Doctors of IDH demonstrated better knowledge regarding the responsible person for waste management and a better attitude regarding the statement that it was a teamwork (p-value < 0.05). Similarly, nurses and cleaners of IDH showed superior level of knowledge of waste handling as well as safer practices, including consistent use of personal protective equipment. Workers of DSH reported higher incidence of errors and sharp injuries also. From the observation, it was found that IDH authority was more likely to follow the waste management guideline. Poor knowledge and attitude were the major barriers for proper waste management in IDH while lack of funds, human resource and logistics were the major barriers in DSH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both hospitals, particularly DSH, demonstrated significant deficiencies in knowledge, attitude, and practice of proper solid medical waste management. Despite limitations, IDH, exhibited more efficient waste management procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"44 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-00748-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proper management of solid medical waste is a crucial component of an efficient healthcare system. The objective of the present study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of medical waste management among the healthcare workers of two selected hospitals of Dhaka city of Bangladesh.

Methods: This cross-sectional, mixed-method study was conducted in two tertiary care hospitals of Dhaka, Bangladesh-icddr, b Dhaka hospital (Private) and Dhaka Shishu hospital (Public) during November, 2011. A number of 138 healthcare professionals (29 doctors, 80 nurses and 29 cleaners) participated in the study. The study had three parts of data collection: (i) survey with health care workers to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and practices about medical waste management; (ii) in-depth interviews with health officials of infection control committee; and (iii) observation using a facility checklist to determine the current practice of medical waste management.

Results: Overall, participants from IDH had better knowledge, and practice regarding solid medical waste management compared to DSH. Doctors of IDH demonstrated better knowledge regarding the responsible person for waste management and a better attitude regarding the statement that it was a teamwork (p-value < 0.05). Similarly, nurses and cleaners of IDH showed superior level of knowledge of waste handling as well as safer practices, including consistent use of personal protective equipment. Workers of DSH reported higher incidence of errors and sharp injuries also. From the observation, it was found that IDH authority was more likely to follow the waste management guideline. Poor knowledge and attitude were the major barriers for proper waste management in IDH while lack of funds, human resource and logistics were the major barriers in DSH.

Conclusions: Both hospitals, particularly DSH, demonstrated significant deficiencies in knowledge, attitude, and practice of proper solid medical waste management. Despite limitations, IDH, exhibited more efficient waste management procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信