Avoidable false PSMC population size peaks occur across numerous studies.

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Current Biology Pub Date : 2025-02-24 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.028
Leon Hilgers, Shenglin Liu, Axel Jensen, Thomas Brown, Trevor Cousins, Regev Schweiger, Katerina Guschanski, Michael Hiller
{"title":"Avoidable false PSMC population size peaks occur across numerous studies.","authors":"Leon Hilgers, Shenglin Liu, Axel Jensen, Thomas Brown, Trevor Cousins, Regev Schweiger, Katerina Guschanski, Michael Hiller","doi":"10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inferring historical population sizes is key to identifying drivers of ecological and evolutionary change and crucial to predicting the future of species on our rapidly changing planet. The pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) method provided a revolutionary framework to reconstruct species' demographic histories over millions of years based on the genome sequence of a single individual. Here, we detected and solved a common artifact in PSMC and related methods: recent population peaks followed by population collapses. Combining real and simulated genomes, we show that these peaks do not represent true population dynamics. Instead, ill-set default parameters cause false peaks in our own and published data, which can be avoided by adjusting parameter settings. Furthermore, we show that certain changes in population structure can cause similar patterns. Newer methods, like Beta-PSMC, perform better but do not always avoid this artifact. Our results suggest testing multiple parameters that split the first time window before interpreting recent population peaks followed by collapses and call for the development of robust methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":11359,"journal":{"name":"Current Biology","volume":" ","pages":"927-930.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.09.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inferring historical population sizes is key to identifying drivers of ecological and evolutionary change and crucial to predicting the future of species on our rapidly changing planet. The pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) method provided a revolutionary framework to reconstruct species' demographic histories over millions of years based on the genome sequence of a single individual. Here, we detected and solved a common artifact in PSMC and related methods: recent population peaks followed by population collapses. Combining real and simulated genomes, we show that these peaks do not represent true population dynamics. Instead, ill-set default parameters cause false peaks in our own and published data, which can be avoided by adjusting parameter settings. Furthermore, we show that certain changes in population structure can cause similar patterns. Newer methods, like Beta-PSMC, perform better but do not always avoid this artifact. Our results suggest testing multiple parameters that split the first time window before interpreting recent population peaks followed by collapses and call for the development of robust methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Biology
Current Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
869
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Biology is a comprehensive journal that showcases original research in various disciplines of biology. It provides a platform for scientists to disseminate their groundbreaking findings and promotes interdisciplinary communication. The journal publishes articles of general interest, encompassing diverse fields of biology. Moreover, it offers accessible editorial pieces that are specifically designed to enlighten non-specialist readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信