The combined impact of BMI and ABSI on all-cause mortality among American adults with diabetes.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Shuwu Wei, Weimin Jiang, Huijuan Zheng, Jiale Zhang, Jie Yang, Yaoxian Wang, Yang Liu, Liqiao Sun, Xinrong Li, Junping Wei, Weiwei Sun
{"title":"The combined impact of BMI and ABSI on all-cause mortality among American adults with diabetes.","authors":"Shuwu Wei, Weimin Jiang, Huijuan Zheng, Jiale Zhang, Jie Yang, Yaoxian Wang, Yang Liu, Liqiao Sun, Xinrong Li, Junping Wei, Weiwei Sun","doi":"10.1186/s13098-025-01614-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies have emphasized the independent effects of anthropometric indices-including body mass index (BMI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body roundness index (BRI), and Conicity Index-on mortality. However, their combined impact, especially in diabetic populations with distinct obesity patterns, has been less frequently explored. This study investigates both the independent and combined effects of these anthropometric indices on mortality in diabetic Americans and compares their individual and combined diagnostic value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationally representative cohort study was conducted using NHANES data (2005-2018), including 6,572 diabetic adults. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines were applied to evaluate the independent and combined associations of anthropometric indices (BMI, ABSI, WHtR, BRI, and Conicity Index) with all-cause mortality. The weighted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of individual anthropometric indices and their combinations in predicting mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all the anthropometric indices, ABSI exhibited the strongest independent association with all-cause mortality, outperforming other measures such as BMI, WHtR, BRI, and Conicity Index. A clear linear relationship was identified, with higher ABSI tertiles consistently linked to an increased risk of mortality. Notably, within each BMI tertile, ABSI effectively differentiated mortality risk, particularly in the highest tertile. Furthermore, ABSI demonstrated the highest predictive performance among individual metrics (weighted AUC = 0.653) and showed further improvement when combined with BMI (weighted AUC = 0.669).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BMI and ABSI collectively provide a comprehensive evaluation of mortality risk in diabetic populations, capturing the synergistic effects of general and central obesity. These findings highlight the importance of integrating BMI and ABSI into risk assessments to identify high-risk individuals and guide targeted interventions for reducing mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"17 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01614-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have emphasized the independent effects of anthropometric indices-including body mass index (BMI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body roundness index (BRI), and Conicity Index-on mortality. However, their combined impact, especially in diabetic populations with distinct obesity patterns, has been less frequently explored. This study investigates both the independent and combined effects of these anthropometric indices on mortality in diabetic Americans and compares their individual and combined diagnostic value.

Methods: A nationally representative cohort study was conducted using NHANES data (2005-2018), including 6,572 diabetic adults. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines were applied to evaluate the independent and combined associations of anthropometric indices (BMI, ABSI, WHtR, BRI, and Conicity Index) with all-cause mortality. The weighted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of individual anthropometric indices and their combinations in predicting mortality.

Results: Among all the anthropometric indices, ABSI exhibited the strongest independent association with all-cause mortality, outperforming other measures such as BMI, WHtR, BRI, and Conicity Index. A clear linear relationship was identified, with higher ABSI tertiles consistently linked to an increased risk of mortality. Notably, within each BMI tertile, ABSI effectively differentiated mortality risk, particularly in the highest tertile. Furthermore, ABSI demonstrated the highest predictive performance among individual metrics (weighted AUC = 0.653) and showed further improvement when combined with BMI (weighted AUC = 0.669).

Conclusion: BMI and ABSI collectively provide a comprehensive evaluation of mortality risk in diabetic populations, capturing the synergistic effects of general and central obesity. These findings highlight the importance of integrating BMI and ABSI into risk assessments to identify high-risk individuals and guide targeted interventions for reducing mortality.

目的:以往的研究强调了人体测量指标(包括身体质量指数(BMI)、身体形状指数(ABSI)、腰高比(WHtR)、身体圆度指数(BRI)和锥度指数)对死亡率的独立影响。然而,它们的综合影响,特别是在具有明显肥胖模式的糖尿病人群中,却很少被探索。本研究调查了这些人体测量指标对美国糖尿病患者死亡率的独立和联合影响,并比较了它们的单独和联合诊断价值。方法:使用NHANES数据(2005-2018)进行了一项具有全国代表性的队列研究,包括6572名糖尿病成年人。应用加权Cox比例风险模型和限制性三次样条来评估人体测量指数(BMI、ABSI、WHtR、BRI和Conicity Index)与全因死亡率的独立和联合关联。采用加权受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估个体人体测量指标及其组合在预测死亡率中的诊断价值。结果:在所有人体测量指标中,ABSI与全因死亡率的独立相关性最强,优于BMI、WHtR、BRI和Conicity Index等其他测量指标。一个明确的线性关系被确定,较高的ABSI位数始终与死亡风险增加有关。值得注意的是,在每个BMI分位数中,ABSI有效地区分了死亡风险,特别是在最高分位数中。此外,ABSI在单个指标中表现出最高的预测性能(加权AUC = 0.653),并在与BMI(加权AUC = 0.669)结合时显示出进一步的改善。结论:BMI和ABSI共同提供了糖尿病人群死亡风险的综合评估,捕获了全身性和中枢性肥胖的协同效应。这些发现强调了将BMI和ABSI纳入风险评估的重要性,以识别高风险个体并指导有针对性的干预措施以降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信