Human-AI collaboration for ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a clinical trial.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Axel Bukhave Edström, Fatemeh Makouei, Kasper Wennervaldt, Anne Fog Lomholt, Mikkel Kaltoft, Jacob Melchiors, Gitte Bjørn Hvilsom, Magne Bech, Martin Tolsgaard, Tobias Todsen
{"title":"Human-AI collaboration for ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a clinical trial.","authors":"Axel Bukhave Edström, Fatemeh Makouei, Kasper Wennervaldt, Anne Fog Lomholt, Mikkel Kaltoft, Jacob Melchiors, Gitte Bjørn Hvilsom, Magne Bech, Martin Tolsgaard, Tobias Todsen","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09236-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This clinical trial examined how the articifial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostics system S-Detect for Thyroid influences the ultrasound diagnostic work-up of thyroid ultrasound (US) performed by different US users in clinical practice and how different US users influences the diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a clinical trial with 20 participants, including medical students, US novice physicians, and US experienced physicians. Five patients with thyroid nodules (one malignant and four benign) volunteered to undergo a thyroid US scan performed by all 20 participants using the same US systems with S-Detect installed. Participants performed a focused thyroid US on each patient case and made a nodule classification according to the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (EU-TIRADS). They then performed a S-Detect analysis of the same nodule and were asked to re-evaluate their EU-TIRADS reporting. From the EU-TIRADS assessments by participants, we derived a biopsy recommendation outcome of whether fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean diagnostic accuracy for S-Detect was 71.3% (range 40-100%) among all participants, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.31). The accuracy of our biopsy recommendation outcome was 69.8% before and 69.2% after AI for all participants (p = 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this trial, we did not find S-Detect to improve the thyroid diagnostic work-up in clinical practice among novice and intermediate ultrasound operators. However, the operator had a substantial impact on the AI-generated ultrasound diagnosis, with a variation in diagnostic accuracy from 40 to 100%, despite the same patients and ultrasound machines being used in the trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"3221-3231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09236-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This clinical trial examined how the articifial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostics system S-Detect for Thyroid influences the ultrasound diagnostic work-up of thyroid ultrasound (US) performed by different US users in clinical practice and how different US users influences the diagnostic accuracy of S-Detect.

Methods: We conducted a clinical trial with 20 participants, including medical students, US novice physicians, and US experienced physicians. Five patients with thyroid nodules (one malignant and four benign) volunteered to undergo a thyroid US scan performed by all 20 participants using the same US systems with S-Detect installed. Participants performed a focused thyroid US on each patient case and made a nodule classification according to the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting And Data System (EU-TIRADS). They then performed a S-Detect analysis of the same nodule and were asked to re-evaluate their EU-TIRADS reporting. From the EU-TIRADS assessments by participants, we derived a biopsy recommendation outcome of whether fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended.

Results: The mean diagnostic accuracy for S-Detect was 71.3% (range 40-100%) among all participants, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.31). The accuracy of our biopsy recommendation outcome was 69.8% before and 69.2% after AI for all participants (p = 0.75).

Conclusion: In this trial, we did not find S-Detect to improve the thyroid diagnostic work-up in clinical practice among novice and intermediate ultrasound operators. However, the operator had a substantial impact on the AI-generated ultrasound diagnosis, with a variation in diagnostic accuracy from 40 to 100%, despite the same patients and ultrasound machines being used in the trial.

人机协作用于甲状腺结节超声诊断的临床试验。
目的:本临床试验研究基于人工智能(AI)的甲状腺诊断系统S-Detect对临床实践中不同美国用户甲状腺超声(US)超声诊断工作的影响,以及不同美国用户对S-Detect诊断准确性的影响。方法:我们对20名参与者进行了临床试验,包括医学生、美国新手医生和美国经验丰富的医生。5名甲状腺结节患者(1名恶性,4名良性)自愿接受甲状腺超声扫描,所有20名参与者使用安装了S-Detect的相同超声系统进行甲状腺超声扫描。参与者对每个病例进行甲状腺造影,并根据欧洲甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统(EU-TIRADS)进行结节分类。然后,他们对相同的结节进行S-Detect分析,并被要求重新评估他们的EU-TIRADS报告。从参与者的EU-TIRADS评估中,我们得出了是否推荐细针穿刺活检(FNAB)的活检推荐结果。结果:S-Detect在所有参与者中的平均诊断准确率为71.3%(范围40-100%),组间无显著差异(p = 0.31)。我们的活检推荐结果在所有参与者人工智能术前和术后的准确率分别为69.8%和69.2% (p = 0.75)。结论:在本试验中,我们没有发现S-Detect在新手和中级超声操作员的临床实践中改善甲状腺诊断工作。然而,操作人员对人工智能生成的超声诊断产生了重大影响,尽管试验中使用的是相同的患者和超声机器,但诊断准确率从40%到100%不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信