A service evaluation assessing the root canal referral and treatment pathway within the Royal London Dental Hospital

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
James Wootton, Millie Forrest, Mitul Patel, Naren Thanabalan, Mital Patel
{"title":"A service evaluation assessing the root canal referral and treatment pathway within the Royal London Dental Hospital","authors":"James Wootton, Millie Forrest, Mitul Patel, Naren Thanabalan, Mital Patel","doi":"10.1038/s41415-024-7841-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Within the National Health Service (NHS) England, dental hospitals are tasked with assessing and managing complex root canal treatments (RCTs) referred from various service providers. The aim of this service evaluation was to investigate the root canal treatment and retreatment (RCreT) output, case complexity designation and referral pathways to the Royal London Dental Hospital. Methods Data were collected and analysed on non-surgical RCTs completed between 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022, including the number of completed treatments, reason and origin of referrals, referral-to-treatment timelines and complexity of treatments. Results In total, 339 teeth met the inclusion criteria, with external referrals (n = 198) taking an average of 47 weeks from referral to treatment commencement compared to 16 weeks for internal referrals (n = 141). Maxillary incisors and first permanent molars were most commonly referred, with anatomical challenges (33.5%), RCreT (32.2%) and trauma (18%) being the most common reasons. Treatment was completed within an average of 2.7 appointments, with a high proportion of complexity Level 2 and 3 cases being completed. Conclusions The RCT output was shown to be increasing within the service. External referrals are taking longer to be seen and treated compared to NHS targets and internally referred patients; although, further information is needed to understand the exact cause of this. Allocation of treatment complexity appeared to be in line with the clinician''s skill set and experience level, taking an average of 2.7 appointments to complete treatment. Further information on the number of referrals, available consultations and clinic space would provide additional insight into the efficiency and pressures of the service.","PeriodicalId":9229,"journal":{"name":"British Dental Journal","volume":"238 3","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-024-7841-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim Within the National Health Service (NHS) England, dental hospitals are tasked with assessing and managing complex root canal treatments (RCTs) referred from various service providers. The aim of this service evaluation was to investigate the root canal treatment and retreatment (RCreT) output, case complexity designation and referral pathways to the Royal London Dental Hospital. Methods Data were collected and analysed on non-surgical RCTs completed between 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022, including the number of completed treatments, reason and origin of referrals, referral-to-treatment timelines and complexity of treatments. Results In total, 339 teeth met the inclusion criteria, with external referrals (n = 198) taking an average of 47 weeks from referral to treatment commencement compared to 16 weeks for internal referrals (n = 141). Maxillary incisors and first permanent molars were most commonly referred, with anatomical challenges (33.5%), RCreT (32.2%) and trauma (18%) being the most common reasons. Treatment was completed within an average of 2.7 appointments, with a high proportion of complexity Level 2 and 3 cases being completed. Conclusions The RCT output was shown to be increasing within the service. External referrals are taking longer to be seen and treated compared to NHS targets and internally referred patients; although, further information is needed to understand the exact cause of this. Allocation of treatment complexity appeared to be in line with the clinician''s skill set and experience level, taking an average of 2.7 appointments to complete treatment. Further information on the number of referrals, available consultations and clinic space would provide additional insight into the efficiency and pressures of the service.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Dental Journal
British Dental Journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1096
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The role of the BDJ is to inform its readers of ideas, opinions, developments and key issues in dentistry - clinical, practical and scientific - stimulating interest, debate and discussion amongst dentists of all disciplines. All papers published in the BDJ are subject to rigorous peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信