Effects of US state paid family leave policies on perinatal and postpartum health: A quasi-experimental analysis.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Whitney M Wells, Justin S White, Daniel F Collin, Guangyi Wang, Sepideh Modrek, Rita Hamad
{"title":"Effects of US state paid family leave policies on perinatal and postpartum health: A quasi-experimental analysis.","authors":"Whitney M Wells, Justin S White, Daniel F Collin, Guangyi Wang, Sepideh Modrek, Rita Hamad","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US is the only high-income country without a national paid family leave (PFL) policy, although several states have implemented policies recently. This study evaluated whether PFL policies in six states improved maternal and infant health. We used difference-in-differences, a quasi-experimental approach, to estimate the impact of state-level policy implementation. We leveraged recently developed methods designed to account for staggered policy implementation and treatment effect heterogeneity. Data were drawn from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2004-2021 waves. Primary outcomes included breastfeeding, maternal postpartum depressive symptoms, and attendance at a postpartum check-up; secondary outcomes included birth outcomes. Multivariable regressions were adjusted for possible confounders. PFL policies led to increased breastfeeding duration (0.53 weeks; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.99) and decreased depressive symptoms (-0.93 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.84 to -0.01). Policies were also associated with worsening of some birth outcomes, possibly reflecting selection in utero, data limitations, or true negative effects. Estimates were largely robust to alternative specifications, with subgroup differences by race/ethnicity and income. This study adds important evidence on the health effects of state-level PFL policies at a critical point when many states are considering or enacting policies, and during ongoing conversations about national PFL policy implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US is the only high-income country without a national paid family leave (PFL) policy, although several states have implemented policies recently. This study evaluated whether PFL policies in six states improved maternal and infant health. We used difference-in-differences, a quasi-experimental approach, to estimate the impact of state-level policy implementation. We leveraged recently developed methods designed to account for staggered policy implementation and treatment effect heterogeneity. Data were drawn from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2004-2021 waves. Primary outcomes included breastfeeding, maternal postpartum depressive symptoms, and attendance at a postpartum check-up; secondary outcomes included birth outcomes. Multivariable regressions were adjusted for possible confounders. PFL policies led to increased breastfeeding duration (0.53 weeks; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.99) and decreased depressive symptoms (-0.93 percentage points; 95% CI: -1.84 to -0.01). Policies were also associated with worsening of some birth outcomes, possibly reflecting selection in utero, data limitations, or true negative effects. Estimates were largely robust to alternative specifications, with subgroup differences by race/ethnicity and income. This study adds important evidence on the health effects of state-level PFL policies at a critical point when many states are considering or enacting policies, and during ongoing conversations about national PFL policy implementation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信