Critical and non-critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients: which is the most predictive biomarker for disease severity and outcome?: A multicentre prospective cohort study comparing mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, inflammatory and immunological patterns.

Giorgia Montrucchio, Eleonora Balzani, Gabriele Sales, Cesare Bolla, Cristina Sarda, Andrea Della Selva, Massimo Perotto, Fulvio Pomero, Enrico Ravera, Francesca Rumbolo, Tiziana Callegari, Vito Fanelli, Giulio Mengozzi, Luca Brazzi
{"title":"Critical and non-critical coronavirus disease 2019 patients: which is the most predictive biomarker for disease severity and outcome?: A multicentre prospective cohort study comparing mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, inflammatory and immunological patterns.","authors":"Giorgia Montrucchio, Eleonora Balzani, Gabriele Sales, Cesare Bolla, Cristina Sarda, Andrea Della Selva, Massimo Perotto, Fulvio Pomero, Enrico Ravera, Francesca Rumbolo, Tiziana Callegari, Vito Fanelli, Giulio Mengozzi, Luca Brazzi","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients leads to a wide range of clinical manifestations. The evaluation of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) as a prognostic biomarker in noncritical wards (NON-ICU) and intensive care units (ICU), may have a potential in predicting disease severity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the difference in the prognostic power of MR-proADM in NON-ICU wards and in ICUs in a prospective multicentre cohort study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>From January to July 2021, all adult COVID-19 patients requiring admission for more than 48 h.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>One primary centre and two secondary centre hospitals.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred and twenty-three ICU and 77 NON-ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>MR-proADM, lymphocyte subpopulations and immunoglobulins were measured within 48 h and on days 3 and 7. A Log-rank test was used to compare survival curves, using a MR-proADM cut-off value of 1.5 nmol l<sup>-1</sup>. The predictive ability for mortality was compared using the area under the curve and 95% confidence interval (CI) of different receiver-operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The first 48 h MR-proADM values were significantly higher in the ICU group (median value 1.10 [IQR, 0.80 to 1.73] pg ml<sup>-1</sup> vs. 0.90 [0.70 to 1.20] pg ml<sup>-1</sup>, <i>P</i> = 0.020), and statistically significant changes were observed over time for MR-proADM, CD3+, CD4+ and CD56+. In univariate analysis, MR-proADM was the only biomarker that significantly predicted mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.006). The logistic regression model showed an odds ratio for mortality equal to 1.83 (95% CI, 1.08 to 3.37) <i>P</i> = 0.035 for MR-proADM, 1.37 (1.15 to 1.68) <i>P</i> = 0.001 for MuLBSTA and 1.11 (1.05 to 1.18) <i>P</i> less than 0.001 for SAPS II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MR-proADM admission values and trends over time appear to be a suitable marker of illness severity and a patient's risk of mortality in both ICU and NON-ICU settings. Lymphocyte subpopulation dysfunction seems to play a role in defining the severity of COVID-19 but is limited to ICU setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04873388 registered on March 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"2 6","pages":"e0039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients leads to a wide range of clinical manifestations. The evaluation of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) as a prognostic biomarker in noncritical wards (NON-ICU) and intensive care units (ICU), may have a potential in predicting disease severity and outcomes.

Objective: To assess the difference in the prognostic power of MR-proADM in NON-ICU wards and in ICUs in a prospective multicentre cohort study.

Design: From January to July 2021, all adult COVID-19 patients requiring admission for more than 48 h.

Setting: One primary centre and two secondary centre hospitals.

Patients: One hundred and twenty-three ICU and 77 NON-ICU patients.

Intervention: MR-proADM, lymphocyte subpopulations and immunoglobulins were measured within 48 h and on days 3 and 7. A Log-rank test was used to compare survival curves, using a MR-proADM cut-off value of 1.5 nmol l-1. The predictive ability for mortality was compared using the area under the curve and 95% confidence interval (CI) of different receiver-operating characteristic curves.

Main outcome measures: The first 48 h MR-proADM values were significantly higher in the ICU group (median value 1.10 [IQR, 0.80 to 1.73] pg ml-1 vs. 0.90 [0.70 to 1.20] pg ml-1, P = 0.020), and statistically significant changes were observed over time for MR-proADM, CD3+, CD4+ and CD56+. In univariate analysis, MR-proADM was the only biomarker that significantly predicted mortality (P = 0.006). The logistic regression model showed an odds ratio for mortality equal to 1.83 (95% CI, 1.08 to 3.37) P = 0.035 for MR-proADM, 1.37 (1.15 to 1.68) P = 0.001 for MuLBSTA and 1.11 (1.05 to 1.18) P less than 0.001 for SAPS II.

Conclusion: MR-proADM admission values and trends over time appear to be a suitable marker of illness severity and a patient's risk of mortality in both ICU and NON-ICU settings. Lymphocyte subpopulation dysfunction seems to play a role in defining the severity of COVID-19 but is limited to ICU setting.

Trial registration: on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04873388 registered on March 2020.

2019年冠状病毒病危重症和非危重症患者:哪个是疾病严重程度和结局最具预测性的生物标志物?一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,比较中部地区肾上腺髓质素、炎症和免疫模式。
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2导致广泛的临床表现。在非重症病房(NON-ICU)和重症监护病房(ICU)中,评估中部肾上腺髓质素(MR-proADM)作为预后生物标志物,可能具有预测疾病严重程度和结局的潜力。目的:在一项前瞻性多中心队列研究中,评估MR-proADM在非icu病房和icu病房的预后能力差异。设计:2021年1月至7月,所有需要住院48小时以上的成年COVID-19患者。环境:一个初级中心和两个二级中心医院。患者:ICU患者123例,非ICU患者77例。干预:48 h内、第3天、第7天检测MR-proADM、淋巴细胞亚群和免疫球蛋白。采用Log-rank检验比较生存曲线,MR-proADM截断值为1.5 nmol -1。采用不同受者-工作特征曲线的曲线下面积和95%置信区间(CI)对死亡率的预测能力进行比较。主要观察指标:ICU组前48 h MR-proADM值显著升高(中位数1.10 [IQR, 0.80 ~ 1.73] pg ml-1 vs. 0.90 [0.70 ~ 1.20] pg ml-1, P = 0.020),且随着时间推移,MR-proADM、CD3+、CD4+和CD56+的变化均有统计学意义。在单变量分析中,MR-proADM是唯一能显著预测死亡率的生物标志物(P = 0.006)。logistic回归模型显示MR-proADM的死亡率比值比为1.83 (95% CI, 1.08 ~ 3.37) P = 0.035, MuLBSTA的死亡率比值比为1.37 (1.15 ~ 1.68)P = 0.001, SAPS II的死亡率比值比为1.11 (1.05 ~ 1.18)P < 0.001。结论:MR-proADM的入院值和随时间变化的趋势似乎是ICU和非ICU环境中疾病严重程度和患者死亡风险的合适标志。淋巴细胞亚群功能障碍似乎在确定COVID-19严重程度方面发挥作用,但仅限于ICU环境。试验注册:在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,NCT04873388于2020年3月注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信