The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens.

Fatma Uslu Kavrama, Nazli Aydin, Halit Yosuncigir, Yurdanur Ucar
{"title":"The Effect of Build Angle on the Mechanical Properties of 3D- Printed Custom Tray Resin Specimens.","authors":"Fatma Uslu Kavrama, Nazli Aydin, Halit Yosuncigir, Yurdanur Ucar","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of build angle on the flexural strength (FS), elastic modulus (E), and hardness (VH) of stereolithography (SLA) based 3D-printed custom tray resin.

Material and methods: 3D-printed specimens with dimensions of 65.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 3.3 mm ± 0.2 mm were manufactured with different build angles (90, 120, 135, 150, 180 degrees) using custom tray resin. For preparing the specimens in the control groups, the autopolymerizing (AP) resin and the ultraviolet polymerizing (UV) resin were used. FS and E were determined by a three-point bending test, and hardness was evaluated with the VH test. Fracture surfaces were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Statistical analysis of the data was made using a one way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett T3 test.

Results: Considering all parameters, the UV group was statistically significantly lower than the other groups. The mean E value of the 90D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.000) and the 180D group (P=.002). The mean E value of the 120D group was statistically significantly different than those of the 150D group (P=.003) and the 180D group (P=.013). The AP group showed a higher mean VH number (20.20 ±2.08), and the difference was statistically significant compared to the 3D-printed groups (P<.005).

Conclusions: Considering its mechanical properties, it was appropriate to arrange the build angles to different degrees when manufacturing reliable custom trays using SLA. 3D printed custom tray production method was a more standard method compared to AP and UV.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信