Challenges in professional development of anaesthesiology trainees: A cross-sectional survey by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Trainee Committee.

Olivia Dow, Antonia Kustura, Yotam Lior, Joana Berger-Estilita, Diogo Morais, Stefan De Hert, Igor Abramovich
{"title":"Challenges in professional development of anaesthesiology trainees: A cross-sectional survey by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Trainee Committee.","authors":"Olivia Dow, Antonia Kustura, Yotam Lior, Joana Berger-Estilita, Diogo Morais, Stefan De Hert, Igor Abramovich","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted training in anaesthesiology. The global shortage of healthcare workers has also negatively affected training opportunities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current experiences, challenges and professional development of anaesthesiology trainees across Europe.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey of anaesthesiology trainees.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Anaesthesiology trainees from the 42 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC)-affiliated countries.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Quality of training supervision and program structure; the impact of COVID-19 on training and practical learning, trainee support systems, financial challenges and professional development, involvement in the ESAIC Exchange Program and career mobility insights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and seventy-one participants from 35 ESAIC-affiliated European countries highlighted several aspects of anaesthesiology training. Approximately 30.5% of trainees reported being able to independently anaesthetise patients with ASA class 1 and 2 within 3 months, whereas independence for ASA 3 and 4 patients under indirect supervision was achieved by 24.3% between 6 and 9 months. Half of the respondents attained an independent working capacity in the ICU after 1.5 years. Although 51.3% reported receiving adequate training and supervision, only 30.1% received employer financial support for educational activities. The COVID-19 pandemic led to 40.2% being redeployed, primarily to ICUs, with 45.2% experiencing negative training effects. Career-wise, 12.5% engaged in international exchange programs, and 49.1% considered relocating for better career opportunities and work-life balance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings provide valuable insights into the current state of anaesthesiology training in Europe, highlighting the need for adaptive strategies in medical education and training to meet evolving challenges and ensure continual professional growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"3 5","pages":"e0062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted training in anaesthesiology. The global shortage of healthcare workers has also negatively affected training opportunities.

Objective: To evaluate the current experiences, challenges and professional development of anaesthesiology trainees across Europe.

Design: An online cross-sectional survey of anaesthesiology trainees.

Participants: Anaesthesiology trainees from the 42 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC)-affiliated countries.

Main outcome measures: Quality of training supervision and program structure; the impact of COVID-19 on training and practical learning, trainee support systems, financial challenges and professional development, involvement in the ESAIC Exchange Program and career mobility insights.

Results: Seven hundred and seventy-one participants from 35 ESAIC-affiliated European countries highlighted several aspects of anaesthesiology training. Approximately 30.5% of trainees reported being able to independently anaesthetise patients with ASA class 1 and 2 within 3 months, whereas independence for ASA 3 and 4 patients under indirect supervision was achieved by 24.3% between 6 and 9 months. Half of the respondents attained an independent working capacity in the ICU after 1.5 years. Although 51.3% reported receiving adequate training and supervision, only 30.1% received employer financial support for educational activities. The COVID-19 pandemic led to 40.2% being redeployed, primarily to ICUs, with 45.2% experiencing negative training effects. Career-wise, 12.5% engaged in international exchange programs, and 49.1% considered relocating for better career opportunities and work-life balance.

Conclusion: The findings provide valuable insights into the current state of anaesthesiology training in Europe, highlighting the need for adaptive strategies in medical education and training to meet evolving challenges and ensure continual professional growth.

麻醉学培训生专业发展的挑战:欧洲麻醉学和重症监护培训生委员会的横断面调查。
背景:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行扰乱了麻醉学培训。全球保健工作者短缺也对培训机会产生了负面影响。目的:评价欧洲麻醉学培训生的经验、挑战和专业发展。设计:对麻醉学学员进行在线横断面调查。参与者:来自42个欧洲麻醉与重症监护学会(ESAIC)附属国家的麻醉学学员。主要评价指标:培训监督质量和项目结构;2019冠状病毒病对培训和实践学习、学员支持系统、财务挑战和专业发展、参与ESAIC交流计划和职业流动性的影响。结果:来自35个esaic附属欧洲国家的771名参与者强调了麻醉培训的几个方面。大约30.5%的受训者报告能够在3个月内独立麻醉ASA 1级和2级患者,而在间接监督下的ASA 3级和4级患者的独立性在6至9个月内达到24.3%。一半的应答者在1年半后获得了独立的ICU工作能力。虽然51.3%的人报告接受了充分的培训和监督,但只有30.1%的人在教育活动中得到雇主的财政支持。新冠肺炎大流行导致40.2%的人被重新部署,主要是icu, 45.2%的人受到负面培训影响。在职业方面,12.5%的人从事国际交流项目,49.1%的人考虑搬迁以获得更好的职业机会和工作与生活的平衡。结论:研究结果为欧洲麻醉学培训的现状提供了有价值的见解,强调了医学教育和培训需要适应性策略,以应对不断变化的挑战,并确保持续的专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信