Kathrin Koch , Daniela Rodriguez Manrique , Sandra Gigl , Hanyang Ruan , Deniz A. Gürsel , Georgiana Rus-Oswald , Tim Reess , Götz Berberich
{"title":"Decoding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: The Regional Vulnerability Index and Its Association With Clinical Symptoms","authors":"Kathrin Koch , Daniela Rodriguez Manrique , Sandra Gigl , Hanyang Ruan , Deniz A. Gürsel , Georgiana Rus-Oswald , Tim Reess , Götz Berberich","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit notable alterations in brain structure, which are likely to be of clinical relevance. Recently, in schizophrenia, the regional vulnerability index (RVI) was introduced to translate findings from ENIGMA (Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta Analysis) studies to the individual level. Building on this framework, in the current study, we sought to investigate whether the RVI might also serve as a vulnerability index for OCD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Toward this aim, we assessed subcortical volume and cortical thickness in a sample of 250 participants (140 patients with OCD, 110 healthy volunteers) and calculated the RVI by leveraging ENIGMA-derived deficits as the “ground truth” for expected regional brain alterations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Subcortical volume and cortical thickness RVI values were significantly different in patients compared with healthy control participants. In addition, RVI values based on subcortical volume were significantly correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms. Moreover, RVI values for both subcortical volume and cortical thickness were significantly different in medicated subgroups while there was no significant difference in unmedicated patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current results suggest that the RVI may represent an individual characteristic that reflects the degree of correspondence between individual patterns of structural alterations and disease-characteristic patterns of structural alterations. However, our findings also indicate that relatively large effect sizes in the meta-analytic ground truth are a prerequisite for obtaining a meaningful RVI parameter that can also be related to clinical severity. Therefore, the current findings require further validation through additional research to confirm the RVI’s robustness and determine its predictive value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"10 8","pages":"Pages 877-882"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902225000369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit notable alterations in brain structure, which are likely to be of clinical relevance. Recently, in schizophrenia, the regional vulnerability index (RVI) was introduced to translate findings from ENIGMA (Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta Analysis) studies to the individual level. Building on this framework, in the current study, we sought to investigate whether the RVI might also serve as a vulnerability index for OCD.
Methods
Toward this aim, we assessed subcortical volume and cortical thickness in a sample of 250 participants (140 patients with OCD, 110 healthy volunteers) and calculated the RVI by leveraging ENIGMA-derived deficits as the “ground truth” for expected regional brain alterations.
Results
Subcortical volume and cortical thickness RVI values were significantly different in patients compared with healthy control participants. In addition, RVI values based on subcortical volume were significantly correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms. Moreover, RVI values for both subcortical volume and cortical thickness were significantly different in medicated subgroups while there was no significant difference in unmedicated patients.
Conclusions
The current results suggest that the RVI may represent an individual characteristic that reflects the degree of correspondence between individual patterns of structural alterations and disease-characteristic patterns of structural alterations. However, our findings also indicate that relatively large effect sizes in the meta-analytic ground truth are a prerequisite for obtaining a meaningful RVI parameter that can also be related to clinical severity. Therefore, the current findings require further validation through additional research to confirm the RVI’s robustness and determine its predictive value.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.