Decoding obsessive-compulsive disorder: Regional Vulnerability Index and its Association with Clinical Symptoms.

Kathrin Koch, Daniela Rodriguez Manrique, Sandra Gigl, Hanyang Ruan, Deniz A Gürsel, Georgiana Rus-Oswald, Tim Reess, Götz Berberich
{"title":"Decoding obsessive-compulsive disorder: Regional Vulnerability Index and its Association with Clinical Symptoms.","authors":"Kathrin Koch, Daniela Rodriguez Manrique, Sandra Gigl, Hanyang Ruan, Deniz A Gürsel, Georgiana Rus-Oswald, Tim Reess, Götz Berberich","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit notable alterations in brain structure, which are likely to be of clinical relevance. Recently, in schizophrenia, the regional vulnerability index (RVI) was introduced to translate findings from Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) studies to the individual level. Building on this framework, the present study sought to investigate whether the RVI might also serve as a vulnerability index for OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To this aim, we asssessed subcortical volume and cortical thickness in a sample of 250 participants (140 patients with OCD, 110 healthy volunteers) and calculated the RVI by leveraging ENIGMA-derived deficits as the \"ground truth\" for expected regional brain alterations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subcortical volume and cortical thickness RVI values were significantly different in patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, RVI values based on subcortical volume were significantly correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms. Moreover, RVI values for both subcortical volume and cortical thickness were significantly different in medicated subgroups while there was no significant difference in unmedicated patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present results suggest that RVI may represent an individual characteristic reflecting the degree of correspondence between individual patterns of structural alterations and disease-characteristic patterns of structural alterations. However, our findings also indicate that relatively large effect sizes in the meta-analytic \"ground truth\" are a prerequisite for obtaining a meaningful RVI parameter that can also be related to clinical severity. Hence, present findings require further validation through additional research to confirm the RVI's robustness and to determine its predictive value.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) exhibit notable alterations in brain structure, which are likely to be of clinical relevance. Recently, in schizophrenia, the regional vulnerability index (RVI) was introduced to translate findings from Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) studies to the individual level. Building on this framework, the present study sought to investigate whether the RVI might also serve as a vulnerability index for OCD.

Methods: To this aim, we asssessed subcortical volume and cortical thickness in a sample of 250 participants (140 patients with OCD, 110 healthy volunteers) and calculated the RVI by leveraging ENIGMA-derived deficits as the "ground truth" for expected regional brain alterations.

Results: Subcortical volume and cortical thickness RVI values were significantly different in patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, RVI values based on subcortical volume were significantly correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms. Moreover, RVI values for both subcortical volume and cortical thickness were significantly different in medicated subgroups while there was no significant difference in unmedicated patients.

Conclusions: The present results suggest that RVI may represent an individual characteristic reflecting the degree of correspondence between individual patterns of structural alterations and disease-characteristic patterns of structural alterations. However, our findings also indicate that relatively large effect sizes in the meta-analytic "ground truth" are a prerequisite for obtaining a meaningful RVI parameter that can also be related to clinical severity. Hence, present findings require further validation through additional research to confirm the RVI's robustness and to determine its predictive value.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信