Sampling techniques and genomic analysis of biological material from artworks

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Rhonda K. Roby PhD, MPH, Rosana A. Wiscovitch-Russo PhD, Rebecca Hart BA, Amanda E. Appel BA, Manija A. Kazmi MS, Thomas Huber PhD, Karina C. Åberg MFA, Thomas P. Sakmar MD, José A. Lorente MD, PhD, Norberto Gonzalez-Juarbe PhD
{"title":"Sampling techniques and genomic analysis of biological material from artworks","authors":"Rhonda K. Roby PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Rosana A. Wiscovitch-Russo PhD,&nbsp;Rebecca Hart BA,&nbsp;Amanda E. Appel BA,&nbsp;Manija A. Kazmi MS,&nbsp;Thomas Huber PhD,&nbsp;Karina C. Åberg MFA,&nbsp;Thomas P. Sakmar MD,&nbsp;José A. Lorente MD, PhD,&nbsp;Norberto Gonzalez-Juarbe PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.15701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The genomic analysis of biological material from artworks can be used to guide curation, preservation, and restoration. Additionally, human DNA recovered from artworks may provide other insights. However, the recovery of biological samples from artworks is dependent on the sampling technique used and the media from which the biological materials are recovered. The ideal sampling method should be noninvasive, yet robust. We studied five artworks on paper and compared three sampling methods, each with increasing degrees of invasiveness. Minimally invasive swabbing techniques collect samples from the surface, whereas more aggressive techniques such as wet vacuuming were expected to yield more biological material from within the support media and more likely to produce authentic DNA from the artwork. We report a comparison of collection techniques to generate microbial DNA sequence data, the conserved human gene RNase P, and Y-STRs from artworks on paper. We observed that wet vacuuming resulted in higher DNA recovery than double swabbing and core punches. Diverse microbial populations existed on the corners and centers of the five artworks studied, but the distribution of the total biomass was relatively even across the surfaces of the works sampled. Studies of peripheral regions, where sampling is less likely to cause alterations to the artwork, could thus yield useful results in microbiome and human DNA studies. These results provide a framework for sampling artworks on paper to obtain biological material. The methods described may provide microbiome identification to facilitate restoration and preservation, and might also contribute to the determination of provenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"70 2","pages":"476-489"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1556-4029.15701","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The genomic analysis of biological material from artworks can be used to guide curation, preservation, and restoration. Additionally, human DNA recovered from artworks may provide other insights. However, the recovery of biological samples from artworks is dependent on the sampling technique used and the media from which the biological materials are recovered. The ideal sampling method should be noninvasive, yet robust. We studied five artworks on paper and compared three sampling methods, each with increasing degrees of invasiveness. Minimally invasive swabbing techniques collect samples from the surface, whereas more aggressive techniques such as wet vacuuming were expected to yield more biological material from within the support media and more likely to produce authentic DNA from the artwork. We report a comparison of collection techniques to generate microbial DNA sequence data, the conserved human gene RNase P, and Y-STRs from artworks on paper. We observed that wet vacuuming resulted in higher DNA recovery than double swabbing and core punches. Diverse microbial populations existed on the corners and centers of the five artworks studied, but the distribution of the total biomass was relatively even across the surfaces of the works sampled. Studies of peripheral regions, where sampling is less likely to cause alterations to the artwork, could thus yield useful results in microbiome and human DNA studies. These results provide a framework for sampling artworks on paper to obtain biological material. The methods described may provide microbiome identification to facilitate restoration and preservation, and might also contribute to the determination of provenance.

Abstract Image

艺术品生物材料的采样技术和基因组分析。
艺术品中生物材料的基因组分析可用于指导策展、保存和修复。此外,从艺术品中提取的人类DNA可能会提供其他见解。然而,从艺术品中回收生物样本取决于所使用的采样技术和从中回收生物材料的介质。理想的采样方法应该是非侵入性的,但鲁棒性。我们研究了五件纸上艺术品,并比较了三种采样方法,每种方法的侵入程度都在增加。微创抽拭技术从表面收集样本,而更激进的技术,如湿真空,有望从支撑介质中产生更多的生物材料,更有可能从艺术品中产生真实的DNA。我们报告了收集技术的比较,以产生微生物DNA序列数据,保守的人类基因RNase P和y - str从艺术品的纸上。我们观察到,湿抽真空比双重抽吸和钻芯获得更高的DNA回收率。在研究的五件艺术品的角落和中心存在不同的微生物种群,但总生物量在采样作品表面的分布相对均匀。对周围区域的研究,在那里取样不太可能导致艺术品的改变,因此可以在微生物组和人类DNA研究中产生有用的结果。这些结果为在纸上取样艺术品以获得生物材料提供了一个框架。所描述的方法可以提供微生物组鉴定,以促进恢复和保存,也可能有助于确定来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of forensic sciences
Journal of forensic sciences 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信