Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for pain control after orthopaedic surgery: A prospective study during in-hospital and ambulatory care.

Ana María Espinoza, Patricio A Leyton, Marcia Robles, Javiera Vargas, Loreto A Muñoz
{"title":"Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for pain control after orthopaedic surgery: A prospective study during in-hospital and ambulatory care.","authors":"Ana María Espinoza, Patricio A Leyton, Marcia Robles, Javiera Vargas, Loreto A Muñoz","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide an opioid-free alternative for pain control after orthopaedic surgery. However, postdischarge ambulatory patient care and follow-up concerns have prevented CPNB use at home.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address physicians' concerns about the outpatient use of CPNB.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cohort, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single centre, teaching private hospital in Santiago, Chile, between July 2016 and March 2020.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included patients aged at least 18 who underwent orthopaedic surgery using CPNB for postoperative pain management. Patients scheduled simultaneously for non-orthopedic surgery on the same event were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pain scores, opioid use, and complication rates at both in-hospital and at-home sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPNB were provided as an analgesia plan in 497 patients who met inclusion criteria, and 387 (77.87%) were discharged home with this continuous analgesia. At 48 h, 70% of the patients reported no-worse-than-mild pain. Less than 3.1% of patients reported an episode of severe pain, and less than 13% of the patients required opioid rescue medication. Transient neurological symptoms were observed in 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4 to 16.1) of the patients. No long-term or severe complications were observed. High rates of satisfaction were reached among patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In-hospital and at-home use of CPNB supervised by a pain service team provides a feasible and safe alternative after orthopaedic surgery, pain control with a low requirement of opioids.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"4 1","pages":"e0067"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (CPNB) provide an opioid-free alternative for pain control after orthopaedic surgery. However, postdischarge ambulatory patient care and follow-up concerns have prevented CPNB use at home.

Objective: To address physicians' concerns about the outpatient use of CPNB.

Design: Prospective, cohort, observational study.

Setting: Single centre, teaching private hospital in Santiago, Chile, between July 2016 and March 2020.

Patients: We included patients aged at least 18 who underwent orthopaedic surgery using CPNB for postoperative pain management. Patients scheduled simultaneously for non-orthopedic surgery on the same event were excluded.

Main outcome measures: Pain scores, opioid use, and complication rates at both in-hospital and at-home sites.

Results: CPNB were provided as an analgesia plan in 497 patients who met inclusion criteria, and 387 (77.87%) were discharged home with this continuous analgesia. At 48 h, 70% of the patients reported no-worse-than-mild pain. Less than 3.1% of patients reported an episode of severe pain, and less than 13% of the patients required opioid rescue medication. Transient neurological symptoms were observed in 13% (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.4 to 16.1) of the patients. No long-term or severe complications were observed. High rates of satisfaction were reached among patients.

Conclusion: In-hospital and at-home use of CPNB supervised by a pain service team provides a feasible and safe alternative after orthopaedic surgery, pain control with a low requirement of opioids.

连续周围神经阻滞用于骨科手术后疼痛控制:一项住院和门诊护理的前瞻性研究。
背景:连续周围神经阻滞(CPNB)为骨科手术后疼痛控制提供了一种不含阿片类药物的替代方法。然而,出院后的门诊病人护理和随访问题阻碍了在家中使用CPNB。目的:探讨门诊医师对CPNB使用的担忧。设计:前瞻性、队列、观察性研究。地点:2016年7月至2020年3月,智利圣地亚哥的单中心私立教学医院。患者:我们纳入了年龄在18岁以上、使用CPNB进行骨科手术术后疼痛管理的患者。排除在同一事件中同时安排非骨科手术的患者。主要结局指标:疼痛评分、阿片类药物使用和住院和家庭的并发症发生率。结果:497例符合纳入标准的患者采用CPNB作为镇痛方案,387例(77.87%)患者出院时采用该方案。48小时时,70%的患者报告疼痛不超过轻度。不到3.1%的患者报告有剧烈疼痛发作,不到13%的患者需要阿片类药物抢救。13%(95%可信区间(CI), 10.4 ~ 16.1)的患者出现短暂性神经系统症状。未观察到长期或严重并发症。患者满意率高。结论:在疼痛服务团队的监督下,在医院和家庭使用CPNB是骨科手术后一种可行、安全、对阿片类药物需求低的疼痛控制选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信