Effect of double adhesive layer application on micro-tensile dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2024.1484498
Afnan O Al-Zain, Asrar Albuqayli, Abdulaziz Albogami, Abdulghani Alkudsi, Meshari Alwabiri, Abdullah T Koshak, Hattan Alsefri, Eliseu A Munchow
{"title":"Effect of double adhesive layer application on micro-tensile dentin bond strength of a universal adhesive.","authors":"Afnan O Al-Zain, Asrar Albuqayli, Abdulaziz Albogami, Abdulghani Alkudsi, Meshari Alwabiri, Abdullah T Koshak, Hattan Alsefri, Eliseu A Munchow","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1484498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Achieving optimal dentin bond strength is crucial for the long-term success of adhesive restorations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of double adhesive layer application, with and without light curing between applications, on the micro-tensile dentin bond strength (µ-TBS) of a universal adhesive, in comparison to the conventional single-layer application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Intact human molars were divided into three groups (<i>n</i> = 15) according to the adhesive application technique using a universal self-etch adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal, Ivoclar) as follows: (1) according to the manufacturer's instructions, (2) double-layer application without light curing between layers, and (3) double-layer application with light curing between layers. Samples were immediately tested for µ-TBS, with failure types recorded as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Representative samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using multiple-way ANOVA (<i>α</i> = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The double adhesive layer with and without light curing between layers showed similar μ-TBS to that of the control group (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that the accurate application of a single layer of a universal adhesive can be as effective as more complex techniques. Additionally, the use of universal bonding agents may have contributed to the outcomes observed in this study. In conclusion, double adhesive layer application and light curing between adhesive layers did not increase the µ-TBS with the universal adhesive agent explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"1484498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1484498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Achieving optimal dentin bond strength is crucial for the long-term success of adhesive restorations. This study aims to evaluate the impact of double adhesive layer application, with and without light curing between applications, on the micro-tensile dentin bond strength (µ-TBS) of a universal adhesive, in comparison to the conventional single-layer application.

Methods: Intact human molars were divided into three groups (n = 15) according to the adhesive application technique using a universal self-etch adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal, Ivoclar) as follows: (1) according to the manufacturer's instructions, (2) double-layer application without light curing between layers, and (3) double-layer application with light curing between layers. Samples were immediately tested for µ-TBS, with failure types recorded as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Representative samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed using multiple-way ANOVA (α = 0.05).

Results: The double adhesive layer with and without light curing between layers showed similar μ-TBS to that of the control group (p > 0.05).

Discussion: From a clinical perspective, these findings suggest that the accurate application of a single layer of a universal adhesive can be as effective as more complex techniques. Additionally, the use of universal bonding agents may have contributed to the outcomes observed in this study. In conclusion, double adhesive layer application and light curing between adhesive layers did not increase the µ-TBS with the universal adhesive agent explored.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信