[Ultrasound study for quantitative assessment of diaphragm dysfunction in patients with sepsis].

G Y Jiao, Y J Liu, K Y Yang, W H Kong, Y Q Chen
{"title":"[Ultrasound study for quantitative assessment of diaphragm dysfunction in patients with sepsis].","authors":"G Y Jiao, Y J Liu, K Y Yang, W H Kong, Y Q Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20240620-00348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To systematically assess diaphragm dysfunction in patients with sepsis. Based on previous findings that diaphragm excursion and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) significantly decrease in septic patients, this study further analyzed the diaphragm contraction velocity and excursion-time index (E-T index) in relation to diaphragm contraction time. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 59 patients with pneumonia-induced sepsis from Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were recruited (sepsis group). Healthy individuals undergoing routine health check-ups during the same period were recruited as the control group, matched for age and sex (1∶1). General baseline data were collected, and bedside ultrasound was used to measure diaphragm thickness, DTF, diaphragm excursion, inspiratory time, diaphragm E-T index, and per-minute E-T index (calculated as the quiet breathing diaphragm E-T index multiplied by the respiratory rate). Correlation analyses were performed between diaphragm ultrasound indicators and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. SPSS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis. <b>Results:</b> (1) There was no statistically significant difference in diaphragm thickness between the sepsis group and the control group (end of quiet expiratory: (2.06±0.35)mm <i>vs</i>. (1.96±0.37)mm, <i>t</i>=-1.516, <i>P</i>>0.05; end of maximum inspiratory: 3.18(2.86, 3.61)mm <i>vs</i>. 3.04(2.73, 3.27)mm, <i>Z</i>=-1.688, <i>P</i>>0.05), while DTF was significantly lower in the sepsis group compared to the control group (0.49±0.17 <i>vs</i>. 0.65±0.17, <i>t</i>=5.360, <i>P</i><0.05). (2) In both quiet breathing and deep breathing states, diaphragm excursion was lower in the sepsis group than in the control group (quiet breathing: <i>t</i>=-4.187, <i>P</i><0.05; deep breathing: <i>t</i>=-11.720, <i>P</i><0.05), and inspiratory time was shorter in the sepsis group (quiet breathing: <i>t</i>=-7.410, <i>P</i><0.05; deep breathing: <i>t</i>=-6.348, <i>P</i><0.05). (3) In the quiet breathing state, the diaphragm contraction velocity in the sepsis group was faster than in the control group (<i>Z</i>=2.330, <i>P</i><0.05), while in the deep breathing state, the diaphragm contraction velocity in the sepsis group was lower than in the control group (<i>Z</i>=-3.383, <i>P</i><0.05). (4) In the quiet breathing state, the diaphragm E-T index was lower in the sepsis group than in the control group (<i>Z</i>=-5.762, <i>P</i><0.05); however, the per-minute E-T index compensated to normal by increasing the respiratory rate. In the deep breathing state, the diaphragm E-T index, which had the highest correlation with the SOFA score (<i>r</i>=-0.882, <i>P</i><0.05), was lower in the sepsis group than in the control group (<i>Z</i>=-7.974, <i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Bedside ultrasound can systematically quantify diaphragm contraction dysfunction in patients with sepsis. In the quiet breathing state, septic patients exhibit a pattern of shallow and rapid breathing, allowing the body to compensate for oxygen demand. In the deep breathing state, the intrinsic contraction efficiency and functional capacity of the diaphragm in septic patients decreases and the diaphragm is unable to meet the body's oxygen requirements due to decompensation.</p>","PeriodicalId":61512,"journal":{"name":"中华结核和呼吸杂志","volume":"48 2","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华结核和呼吸杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20240620-00348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically assess diaphragm dysfunction in patients with sepsis. Based on previous findings that diaphragm excursion and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) significantly decrease in septic patients, this study further analyzed the diaphragm contraction velocity and excursion-time index (E-T index) in relation to diaphragm contraction time. Methods: A total of 59 patients with pneumonia-induced sepsis from Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University were recruited (sepsis group). Healthy individuals undergoing routine health check-ups during the same period were recruited as the control group, matched for age and sex (1∶1). General baseline data were collected, and bedside ultrasound was used to measure diaphragm thickness, DTF, diaphragm excursion, inspiratory time, diaphragm E-T index, and per-minute E-T index (calculated as the quiet breathing diaphragm E-T index multiplied by the respiratory rate). Correlation analyses were performed between diaphragm ultrasound indicators and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. SPSS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: (1) There was no statistically significant difference in diaphragm thickness between the sepsis group and the control group (end of quiet expiratory: (2.06±0.35)mm vs. (1.96±0.37)mm, t=-1.516, P>0.05; end of maximum inspiratory: 3.18(2.86, 3.61)mm vs. 3.04(2.73, 3.27)mm, Z=-1.688, P>0.05), while DTF was significantly lower in the sepsis group compared to the control group (0.49±0.17 vs. 0.65±0.17, t=5.360, P<0.05). (2) In both quiet breathing and deep breathing states, diaphragm excursion was lower in the sepsis group than in the control group (quiet breathing: t=-4.187, P<0.05; deep breathing: t=-11.720, P<0.05), and inspiratory time was shorter in the sepsis group (quiet breathing: t=-7.410, P<0.05; deep breathing: t=-6.348, P<0.05). (3) In the quiet breathing state, the diaphragm contraction velocity in the sepsis group was faster than in the control group (Z=2.330, P<0.05), while in the deep breathing state, the diaphragm contraction velocity in the sepsis group was lower than in the control group (Z=-3.383, P<0.05). (4) In the quiet breathing state, the diaphragm E-T index was lower in the sepsis group than in the control group (Z=-5.762, P<0.05); however, the per-minute E-T index compensated to normal by increasing the respiratory rate. In the deep breathing state, the diaphragm E-T index, which had the highest correlation with the SOFA score (r=-0.882, P<0.05), was lower in the sepsis group than in the control group (Z=-7.974, P<0.05). Conclusions: Bedside ultrasound can systematically quantify diaphragm contraction dysfunction in patients with sepsis. In the quiet breathing state, septic patients exhibit a pattern of shallow and rapid breathing, allowing the body to compensate for oxygen demand. In the deep breathing state, the intrinsic contraction efficiency and functional capacity of the diaphragm in septic patients decreases and the diaphragm is unable to meet the body's oxygen requirements due to decompensation.

[超声定量评价脓毒症患者膈肌功能障碍的研究]。
目的:系统评价脓毒症患者膈肌功能障碍。在前人研究发现脓毒症患者膈肌漂移和膈肌增厚分数(DTF)明显降低的基础上,本研究进一步分析了膈肌收缩速度和漂移时间指数(E-T指数)与膈肌收缩时间的关系。方法:选取中国医科大学附属盛京医院肺炎脓毒症患者59例(脓毒症组)。选取同期进行常规健康体检的健康人作为对照组,年龄、性别匹配(1∶1)。收集一般基线资料,床边超声测量膈膜厚度、DTF、膈膜偏移、吸气时间、膈膜E-T指数、每分钟E-T指数(以安静呼吸膈膜E-T指数乘以呼吸频率计算)。对膈超声指标与序贯性器官衰竭评分(SOFA)进行相关性分析。采用SPSS 21.0进行统计分析。结果:(1)脓毒症组与对照组膈膜厚度差异无统计学意义(静息呼气末:(2.06±0.35)mm vs(1.96±0.37)mm, t=-1.516, P < 0.05;最大吸气端:3.18(2.86,3.61)mm vs. 3.04(2.73, 3.27)mm, Z=-1.688, P < 0.05),脓毒症组DTF明显低于对照组(0.49±0.17 vs. 0.65±0.17,t=5.360, Pt=-4.187, Pt=-11.720, Pt=-7.410, Pt=-6.348, PZ=2.330, PZ=-3.383, PZ=-5.762, Pr=-0.882, PZ=-7.974, pp)。结论:床边超声可系统量化脓毒症患者膈肌收缩功能障碍。在安静呼吸状态下,脓毒症患者表现出浅而急促的呼吸模式,使身体能够补偿氧气需求。在深呼吸状态下,脓毒症患者膈肌固有的收缩效率和功能能力下降,膈肌因失代偿而无法满足机体对氧气的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13832
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信