Clinical parameters in patients with halitosis: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2024.1427280
Ahoud Jazzar, Hebah AlDehlawi, Arwa Farag, Sana Alhamed, Sara Akeel, Yasmin Mair, Kenana Flemban, Hidaya Alqassab, Khalid Aljohani
{"title":"Clinical parameters in patients with halitosis: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Ahoud Jazzar, Hebah AlDehlawi, Arwa Farag, Sana Alhamed, Sara Akeel, Yasmin Mair, Kenana Flemban, Hidaya Alqassab, Khalid Aljohani","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1427280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Halitosis, a socially and psychologically impactful condition often resulting from oral or systemic issues, is exacerbated by factors like aging, poor oral hygiene, and dietary choices. This study aimed to investigate the association between halitosis and stress by measuring salivary cortisol levels and the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of 40 participants was conducted using questionnaires and clinical measurements to assess halitosis and stress levels. Saliva samples were collected and analyzed for cortisol using ELISA. Participants' stress was assessed with the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale Questionnaire (CPSS-10) questionnaire, and halitosis was measured with a Halimeter and self-assessment questionnaire. Clinical measurements included Plaque Index (PI) and the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty subjects were split into a halitosis group (mean age 30.75 ± 10.15) and group with no halitosis (mean age 26 ± 5.3). Objective measures confirmed higher halitosis scores (3.70 ± 0.73) in the halitosis group vs. the second group (2.60 ± 1.67). Compared with the group with no halitosis, the halitosis group exhibited significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) more plaque (27.92% ± 17.16% vs. 47.50 ± 33.57%; <i>p</i> < 0.05) and higher DMFT scores (10.10 ± 2.51 vs. 26 ± 5.30), respectively. Salivary cortisol levels were similar across groups (1.721 ng/ml halitosis, 1.781 ng/ml without halitosis). Correlations showed a moderate positive relationship between DMFT and halimeter scores (<i>r</i> = 0.377, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and a moderate negative correlation between stress and plaque index (<i>r</i> = -0.403, <i>p</i> = 0.011), with no correlation between halimeter score and cortisol or CPSS score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings showed that while halitosis severity correlated with higher DMFT scores and plaque accumulation, there was no significant association with salivary cortisol levels, suggesting that stress, as measured by salivary cortisol, may not be a direct contributor to halitosis. Furthermore, the data suggest that poor oral hygiene is a more significant factor in the development of halitosis than stress levels, as assessed by the CPSS-10.</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"1427280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1427280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Halitosis, a socially and psychologically impactful condition often resulting from oral or systemic issues, is exacerbated by factors like aging, poor oral hygiene, and dietary choices. This study aimed to investigate the association between halitosis and stress by measuring salivary cortisol levels and the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS).

Methods: A cross-sectional study of 40 participants was conducted using questionnaires and clinical measurements to assess halitosis and stress levels. Saliva samples were collected and analyzed for cortisol using ELISA. Participants' stress was assessed with the Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale Questionnaire (CPSS-10) questionnaire, and halitosis was measured with a Halimeter and self-assessment questionnaire. Clinical measurements included Plaque Index (PI) and the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth (DMFT) score.

Results: Forty subjects were split into a halitosis group (mean age 30.75 ± 10.15) and group with no halitosis (mean age 26 ± 5.3). Objective measures confirmed higher halitosis scores (3.70 ± 0.73) in the halitosis group vs. the second group (2.60 ± 1.67). Compared with the group with no halitosis, the halitosis group exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) more plaque (27.92% ± 17.16% vs. 47.50 ± 33.57%; p < 0.05) and higher DMFT scores (10.10 ± 2.51 vs. 26 ± 5.30), respectively. Salivary cortisol levels were similar across groups (1.721 ng/ml halitosis, 1.781 ng/ml without halitosis). Correlations showed a moderate positive relationship between DMFT and halimeter scores (r = 0.377, p = 0.018) and a moderate negative correlation between stress and plaque index (r = -0.403, p = 0.011), with no correlation between halimeter score and cortisol or CPSS score.

Conclusions: Our findings showed that while halitosis severity correlated with higher DMFT scores and plaque accumulation, there was no significant association with salivary cortisol levels, suggesting that stress, as measured by salivary cortisol, may not be a direct contributor to halitosis. Furthermore, the data suggest that poor oral hygiene is a more significant factor in the development of halitosis than stress levels, as assessed by the CPSS-10.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信