Antibiofilm efficacy of plant extracts as root canal irrigants in endodontics: a systematic literature review.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2024.1479953
Jihad Diouchi, Babacar Touré, Sonia Ghoul
{"title":"Antibiofilm efficacy of plant extracts as root canal irrigants in endodontics: a systematic literature review.","authors":"Jihad Diouchi, Babacar Touré, Sonia Ghoul","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1479953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the antibiofilm efficacy of plant extracts against <i>in vitro</i> formed single and multispecies endodontic biofilms, in comparison to conventional root canal irrigants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched up to April 2024. Studies investigating the antibiofilm efficacy, of at least one plant extract and one conventional root canal irrigant, against endodontic biofilms were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. Data were extracted, and studies were critically assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 78 articles, eight articles met the criteria and were eventually included in this review. One study showed a high risk of bias, six showed a moderate risk of bias, and one showed a low risk. A total of twelve plant extracts were tested for their antibiofilm efficacy against eight different single-species biofilms and one multispecies biofilm. A combination of microscopy methods and culturing techniques was used for the assessment of their efficacies. Plant extracts exhibited either a biofilm disruption and/or inhibition of biofilm formation. Psidium cattleianum extract and Psidium guajava exhibited enhanced efficacy compared to Chlorhexidine and NaOCl, respectively. Allium sativum demonstrated comparable efficacy to NaOCl. Furthermore, the combination of Cymbopogon martinii essential oil and NaOCl was found to be more effective than either alone when tested on a multispecies biofilm. However, the other plant extracts, such as Mikania Sprengel, Salvadora persica, Camellia sinensis, and Vitis vinifera showed efficacy but were still inferior compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the tested plant extracts demonstrated promising potential for combating <i>in vitro</i> endodontic biofilms. In that context, integrating conventional therapy protocols with plant-inspired treatments may allow effective endodontic biofilm eradication. Hence, future research should focus on optimizing the synergistic combinations of these extracts with NaOCl to maximize the therapeutic outcomes. Heterogeneity amongst the studies prevented a meta-analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"1479953"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1479953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To explore the antibiofilm efficacy of plant extracts against in vitro formed single and multispecies endodontic biofilms, in comparison to conventional root canal irrigants.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched up to April 2024. Studies investigating the antibiofilm efficacy, of at least one plant extract and one conventional root canal irrigant, against endodontic biofilms were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. Data were extracted, and studies were critically assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Results: Among 78 articles, eight articles met the criteria and were eventually included in this review. One study showed a high risk of bias, six showed a moderate risk of bias, and one showed a low risk. A total of twelve plant extracts were tested for their antibiofilm efficacy against eight different single-species biofilms and one multispecies biofilm. A combination of microscopy methods and culturing techniques was used for the assessment of their efficacies. Plant extracts exhibited either a biofilm disruption and/or inhibition of biofilm formation. Psidium cattleianum extract and Psidium guajava exhibited enhanced efficacy compared to Chlorhexidine and NaOCl, respectively. Allium sativum demonstrated comparable efficacy to NaOCl. Furthermore, the combination of Cymbopogon martinii essential oil and NaOCl was found to be more effective than either alone when tested on a multispecies biofilm. However, the other plant extracts, such as Mikania Sprengel, Salvadora persica, Camellia sinensis, and Vitis vinifera showed efficacy but were still inferior compared to the control group.

Conclusions: Overall, the tested plant extracts demonstrated promising potential for combating in vitro endodontic biofilms. In that context, integrating conventional therapy protocols with plant-inspired treatments may allow effective endodontic biofilm eradication. Hence, future research should focus on optimizing the synergistic combinations of these extracts with NaOCl to maximize the therapeutic outcomes. Heterogeneity amongst the studies prevented a meta-analysis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信