{"title":"Genetic Architecture, Spatial Heterogeneity, and the Arms Race between Newts and Snakes: Exploring Coevolution with Simulations.","authors":"Victoria Caudill, Peter Ralph","doi":"10.1086/733456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractCoevolution between two species can lead to exaggerated phenotypes that vary in a correlated manner across space. However, the conditions under which we expect such spatially varying coevolutionary patterns in polygenic traits are not well understood. We investigate the coevolutionary dynamics between two species undergoing reciprocal adaptation across space and time using simulations inspired by the <i>Taricha</i> newt/<i>Thamnophis</i> garter snake system. One striking observation from this system is that newts in some areas carry much more tetrodotoxin than in other areas, and garter snakes that live near more toxic newts tend to be more resistant to this toxin, a correlation seen across several broad geographic areas. Furthermore, snakes seem to be \"winning\" the coevolutionary arms race, that is, having a high level of resistance compared with local newt toxicity, despite substantial variation in both toxicity and resistance across the range. We explore how possible genetic architectures of the toxin and resistance traits would affect the coevolutionary dynamics by manipulating both mutation rate and effect size of mutations across many simulations. We find that coevolutionary dynamics alone were not sufficient in our simulations to produce the striking mosaic of levels of toxicity and resistance observed in nature, but simulations with ecological heterogeneity (in trait costliness or interaction rate) did produce such patterns. We also find that differences in polygenicity do not seem sufficient to explain the observation that snakes seem to be winning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"205 2","pages":"184-202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/733456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractCoevolution between two species can lead to exaggerated phenotypes that vary in a correlated manner across space. However, the conditions under which we expect such spatially varying coevolutionary patterns in polygenic traits are not well understood. We investigate the coevolutionary dynamics between two species undergoing reciprocal adaptation across space and time using simulations inspired by the Taricha newt/Thamnophis garter snake system. One striking observation from this system is that newts in some areas carry much more tetrodotoxin than in other areas, and garter snakes that live near more toxic newts tend to be more resistant to this toxin, a correlation seen across several broad geographic areas. Furthermore, snakes seem to be "winning" the coevolutionary arms race, that is, having a high level of resistance compared with local newt toxicity, despite substantial variation in both toxicity and resistance across the range. We explore how possible genetic architectures of the toxin and resistance traits would affect the coevolutionary dynamics by manipulating both mutation rate and effect size of mutations across many simulations. We find that coevolutionary dynamics alone were not sufficient in our simulations to produce the striking mosaic of levels of toxicity and resistance observed in nature, but simulations with ecological heterogeneity (in trait costliness or interaction rate) did produce such patterns. We also find that differences in polygenicity do not seem sufficient to explain the observation that snakes seem to be winning.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.