Antibacterial activity of biodentine against Enterococcus faecalis: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in dental medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdmed.2024.1498353
Hasan Subhi, Nashwah Subhi, Salah Alhaidary, Mahmood S Azeez, Abedelmalek Kalefh Tabnjh
{"title":"Antibacterial activity of biodentine against <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>: a systematic review.","authors":"Hasan Subhi, Nashwah Subhi, Salah Alhaidary, Mahmood S Azeez, Abedelmalek Kalefh Tabnjh","doi":"10.3389/fdmed.2024.1498353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biodentine is a well-known endodontic material that is applied in various endodontic therapies. <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> (<i>E. faecalis</i>) is associated with endodontic failure and persistent periapical infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence regarding the antibacterial activity of Biodentine against <i>E. faecalis</i> and to compare it to other commercial endodontic materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search of literature was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar in addition to a manual search in specialized journals up to May 2024. The eligibility criteria, data extraction, and evaluation of risk of bias were assessed by two independent authors. The risk of bias was evaluated in accordance with Modified CONSORT checklist items for pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 343 studies, thirty-seven fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Thirty studies reported a good antibacterial efficacy of Biodentine against <i>E. faecalis</i>. Biodentine was superior to or, at least, as efficacious as MTA, MTA Angelus, GIC, RMGIC, DiaRoot BioAggregate, NeoPutty, iRoot FS, MTA Repair HP, MTA Biorep, Well-Root PT, Activa, NeoMTA 2, Calcimol LC, TotalFill, and IRM. The findings were supported by studies with medium to high risk of bias (low quality).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the limitations of this systematic review, there is accumulating evidence on the antibacterial activity of Biodentine against <i>E. faecalis</i> in context of endodontics. However, randomized clinical trials with well-designed and robust methodologies are required in order to provide information about its clinical behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":73077,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dental medicine","volume":"5 ","pages":"1498353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11797816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2024.1498353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biodentine is a well-known endodontic material that is applied in various endodontic therapies. Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is associated with endodontic failure and persistent periapical infection. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the available evidence regarding the antibacterial activity of Biodentine against E. faecalis and to compare it to other commercial endodontic materials.

Methods: An electronic search of literature was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar in addition to a manual search in specialized journals up to May 2024. The eligibility criteria, data extraction, and evaluation of risk of bias were assessed by two independent authors. The risk of bias was evaluated in accordance with Modified CONSORT checklist items for pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials.

Results: Out of 343 studies, thirty-seven fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Thirty studies reported a good antibacterial efficacy of Biodentine against E. faecalis. Biodentine was superior to or, at least, as efficacious as MTA, MTA Angelus, GIC, RMGIC, DiaRoot BioAggregate, NeoPutty, iRoot FS, MTA Repair HP, MTA Biorep, Well-Root PT, Activa, NeoMTA 2, Calcimol LC, TotalFill, and IRM. The findings were supported by studies with medium to high risk of bias (low quality).

Conclusions: Considering the limitations of this systematic review, there is accumulating evidence on the antibacterial activity of Biodentine against E. faecalis in context of endodontics. However, randomized clinical trials with well-designed and robust methodologies are required in order to provide information about its clinical behaviour.

Abstract Image

生物牙汀对粪肠球菌抗菌活性的系统综述。
生物牙本质是一种众所周知的牙髓材料,应用于各种牙髓治疗。粪肠球菌(E. faecalis)与牙髓衰竭和持续的根尖周感染有关。本系统综述的目的是总结生物牙定对粪肠杆菌抗菌活性的现有证据,并将其与其他市售牙髓材料进行比较。方法:电子检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar等专业期刊,手工检索截止到2024年5月。入选标准、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两位独立作者进行评估。根据改良的CONSORT牙科材料临床前体外研究清单项目评估偏倚风险。结果:343项研究中,37项符合纳入标准,纳入本综述。30项研究报道了百登定对粪肠杆菌的良好抗菌效果。Biodentine优于或至少与MTA、MTA Angelus、GIC、RMGIC、DiaRoot BioAggregate、NeoPutty、iRoot FS、MTA Repair HP、MTA Biorep、Well-Root PT、Activa、NeoMTA 2、Calcimol LC、TotalFill和IRM一样有效。这些发现得到了中至高偏倚风险(低质量)研究的支持。结论:考虑到本系统综述的局限性,越来越多的证据表明百登定在牙髓学中对粪肠球菌的抗菌作用。然而,为了提供有关其临床行为的信息,需要采用精心设计和可靠方法的随机临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信