Three-dimensional localization of tooth germs without ionizing radiation : Proof-of-concept study using magnetic resonance imaging.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Andreas Detterbeck, Thomas Huber, Matthias Schmid
{"title":"Three-dimensional localization of tooth germs without ionizing radiation : Proof-of-concept study using magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Andreas Detterbeck, Thomas Huber, Matthias Schmid","doi":"10.1007/s00056-024-00575-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the three-dimensional (3D) localization of tooth germs. A MRI 3D dataset was compared to a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dataset, which is the current gold standard method in the localization of tooth germs. In this proof-of-concept study, the potential of eliminating the exposure of patients to ionizing radiation for tooth germ localization was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A halved pig head (Sus scrofa domestica) was imaged with MRI and CBCT. The MRI data were manually segmented using InVesalius 3.1.1 (Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer, Campinas, Brazil) to generate a 3D model, later processed in OnyxCeph3™ (Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany). The CBCT data were directly imported into OnyxCeph3™ for processing. Both datasets were combined with intraoral scans, and 12 raters took measurements to compare the ability to localize tooth germs with the help of the two modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 measurements were obtained (2 modalities × 6 measurement sections × 12 raters). The interrater reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] ≥ 0.99 for both modalities). The average differences between CBCT and MRI measurements ranged between -0.43 mm (Bonferroni-Holm-corrected 90% confidence interval [-0.69 mm, -0.16 mm]) and 0.48 mm [0.34 mm, 0.63 mm] and were equivalent with respect to a margin of -1 mm to 1 mm in all measurement sections (Bonferroni-Holm-corrected P < 0.01 in all sections).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MRI demonstrates high potential as a nonionizing alternative to CBCT for 3D localization of impacted and displaced teeth, particularly in children and adolescents. The fluid-filled dental follicle provides excellent contrast in MRI, aiding precise localization. Future clinical studies with larger sample sizes are essential for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-024-00575-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the three-dimensional (3D) localization of tooth germs. A MRI 3D dataset was compared to a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dataset, which is the current gold standard method in the localization of tooth germs. In this proof-of-concept study, the potential of eliminating the exposure of patients to ionizing radiation for tooth germ localization was evaluated.

Methods: A halved pig head (Sus scrofa domestica) was imaged with MRI and CBCT. The MRI data were manually segmented using InVesalius 3.1.1 (Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer, Campinas, Brazil) to generate a 3D model, later processed in OnyxCeph3™ (Image Instruments GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany). The CBCT data were directly imported into OnyxCeph3™ for processing. Both datasets were combined with intraoral scans, and 12 raters took measurements to compare the ability to localize tooth germs with the help of the two modalities.

Results: A total of 144 measurements were obtained (2 modalities × 6 measurement sections × 12 raters). The interrater reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] ≥ 0.99 for both modalities). The average differences between CBCT and MRI measurements ranged between -0.43 mm (Bonferroni-Holm-corrected 90% confidence interval [-0.69 mm, -0.16 mm]) and 0.48 mm [0.34 mm, 0.63 mm] and were equivalent with respect to a margin of -1 mm to 1 mm in all measurement sections (Bonferroni-Holm-corrected P < 0.01 in all sections).

Conclusion: MRI demonstrates high potential as a nonionizing alternative to CBCT for 3D localization of impacted and displaced teeth, particularly in children and adolescents. The fluid-filled dental follicle provides excellent contrast in MRI, aiding precise localization. Future clinical studies with larger sample sizes are essential for validation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信