Prospective study of the duo-hybrid venous stent for treatment of iliac vein obstruction.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Michael Lichtenberg, Stefan Stahlhoff, Simone Mueller, Konstantinos Stavroulakis
{"title":"Prospective study of the duo-hybrid venous stent for treatment of iliac vein obstruction.","authors":"Michael Lichtenberg, Stefan Stahlhoff, Simone Mueller, Konstantinos Stavroulakis","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> This prospective, single center, exploratory study assessed primary patency, clinical performance, and adverse events associated with the DUO-HYBRID Venous Stent used to treat iliac vein obstruction. <i>Materials and methods:</i> Twenty-one patients with symptomatic obstructions were treated with the self-expanding stent designed with varying zones of fatigue and crush resistance to adapt to the challenging iliac vein anatomy. The primary outcome measure was 12-month primary patency, defined as ≤ 50% residual stenosis, the absence of re-thrombosis or reintervention, and the absence of major adverse events from treatment to discharge. Secondary clinical measures included the Villalta score to assess the symptoms of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) score, both used to measure the severity of venous disease. Finally, the number of device- or procedure-related adverse events were recorded. <i>Results:</i> Primary patency was 92.9% at 12 months: one patient exhibited restenosis greater than 50% at 12 months. CEAP scores at baseline were predominantly C3 - C5 (78.9%) while at 12 months, 78.6% of scores were C1 - C2 and 14.3% were C0. The mean rVCSS score was 5.5 ± 2.7 at baseline and 1.1 ± 1.0 at 12 months, an 80% reduction in the mean score from baseline. Pre-procedure, 14.3% of patients had a Villalta score of 0-4 while at 12 months, 100% had scores of 0-4 (i.e., no clinically meaningful signs of post-thrombotic syndrome). Two adverse events were reported as possibly related to the device but neither case required revascularization. <i>Conclusions:</i> Observations from this exploratory study demonstrated a primary patency rate of 92.9%, improvements in rVCSS, CEAP, and Villalta scores from baseline, and no cases of target lesion or vessel revascularization at 12 months. The DUO-HYBRID Venous Stent performed appropriately when used for its intended indication.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective, single center, exploratory study assessed primary patency, clinical performance, and adverse events associated with the DUO-HYBRID Venous Stent used to treat iliac vein obstruction. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with symptomatic obstructions were treated with the self-expanding stent designed with varying zones of fatigue and crush resistance to adapt to the challenging iliac vein anatomy. The primary outcome measure was 12-month primary patency, defined as ≤ 50% residual stenosis, the absence of re-thrombosis or reintervention, and the absence of major adverse events from treatment to discharge. Secondary clinical measures included the Villalta score to assess the symptoms of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), and the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (rVCSS) and Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) score, both used to measure the severity of venous disease. Finally, the number of device- or procedure-related adverse events were recorded. Results: Primary patency was 92.9% at 12 months: one patient exhibited restenosis greater than 50% at 12 months. CEAP scores at baseline were predominantly C3 - C5 (78.9%) while at 12 months, 78.6% of scores were C1 - C2 and 14.3% were C0. The mean rVCSS score was 5.5 ± 2.7 at baseline and 1.1 ± 1.0 at 12 months, an 80% reduction in the mean score from baseline. Pre-procedure, 14.3% of patients had a Villalta score of 0-4 while at 12 months, 100% had scores of 0-4 (i.e., no clinically meaningful signs of post-thrombotic syndrome). Two adverse events were reported as possibly related to the device but neither case required revascularization. Conclusions: Observations from this exploratory study demonstrated a primary patency rate of 92.9%, improvements in rVCSS, CEAP, and Villalta scores from baseline, and no cases of target lesion or vessel revascularization at 12 months. The DUO-HYBRID Venous Stent performed appropriately when used for its intended indication.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信