Integration of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Into a Medical Student Clinical Reasoning Curriculum.

Q3 Medicine
Julia Caton, Elaina Suridis, Gabrielle R Goldberg
{"title":"Integration of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine Into a Medical Student Clinical Reasoning Curriculum.","authors":"Julia Caton, Elaina Suridis, Gabrielle R Goldberg","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Integration of geriatrics and palliative medicine principles into preexisting medical student curricula is imperative to train future physicians to care for older adults and those facing serious illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a case of an older adult presenting with a change in mental status within a preexisting small-group case-based interactive clinical reasoning curriculum. The 1-hour and 50-minute session embedded the 4Ms framework (mentation, medications, mobility, and what matters most) in a clinical case to allow students an organic opportunity to apply the 4Ms in practice while using their communication, clinical reasoning, and hypothesis-driven physical examination skills. Students and faculty completed an end-of-session survey, and each small group's differential diagnoses were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five second-year students and 26 faculty participated in the session. On retrospective pre-post surveys, student confidence in all the learning objectives significantly improved. Both students and faculty felt that the integration of geriatrics and palliative medicine was effective. Students valued the topic, appreciated the pedagogical approach and the relevance to clinical preparation, and identified opportunities for continued learning. Students' differential diagnoses demonstrated application of components of three of the four Ms in the 4Ms framework (mentation, medications, and mobility). Notably, many learners did not apply the fourth M (what matters most) to the case without prompting.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This curriculum was well received and effective and can be easily adapted for use with various levels of learners. Faculty should look for additional opportunities to integrate content into preexisting curricular structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Integration of geriatrics and palliative medicine principles into preexisting medical student curricula is imperative to train future physicians to care for older adults and those facing serious illness.

Methods: We developed a case of an older adult presenting with a change in mental status within a preexisting small-group case-based interactive clinical reasoning curriculum. The 1-hour and 50-minute session embedded the 4Ms framework (mentation, medications, mobility, and what matters most) in a clinical case to allow students an organic opportunity to apply the 4Ms in practice while using their communication, clinical reasoning, and hypothesis-driven physical examination skills. Students and faculty completed an end-of-session survey, and each small group's differential diagnoses were reviewed.

Results: Seventy-five second-year students and 26 faculty participated in the session. On retrospective pre-post surveys, student confidence in all the learning objectives significantly improved. Both students and faculty felt that the integration of geriatrics and palliative medicine was effective. Students valued the topic, appreciated the pedagogical approach and the relevance to clinical preparation, and identified opportunities for continued learning. Students' differential diagnoses demonstrated application of components of three of the four Ms in the 4Ms framework (mentation, medications, and mobility). Notably, many learners did not apply the fourth M (what matters most) to the case without prompting.

Discussion: This curriculum was well received and effective and can be easily adapted for use with various levels of learners. Faculty should look for additional opportunities to integrate content into preexisting curricular structures.

将老年医学和姑息医学纳入医学生临床推理课程。
前言:整合老年病学和姑息医学原则到现有的医学学生课程是必要的,以培养未来的医生照顾老年人和那些面临严重疾病。方法:我们发展了一个老年人的情况下,在一个预先存在的小组案例为基础的交互式临床推理课程的精神状态的变化。1小时50分钟的课程将4Ms框架(心理状态、药物、行动能力和最重要的东西)嵌入到一个临床案例中,让学生有机会在实践中应用4Ms,同时运用他们的沟通、临床推理和假设驱动的体检技能。学生和教师在课程结束时完成了一项调查,并对每个小组的鉴别诊断进行了回顾。结果:75名二年级学生和26名教师参加了会议。在回顾性的前后调查中,学生对所有学习目标的信心都有显著提高。学生和教师都认为老年医学和姑息医学的结合是有效的。学生们重视这个主题,欣赏教学方法和与临床准备的相关性,并确定了继续学习的机会。学生的鉴别诊断证明了在4Ms框架中四个Ms中的三个Ms的组成部分的应用(心理状态、药物治疗和行动能力)。值得注意的是,许多学习者在没有提示的情况下没有将第四个M(最重要的)应用到案例中。讨论:这个课程很受欢迎,很有效,可以很容易地适应不同水平的学习者。教师应该寻找更多的机会将内容整合到已有的课程结构中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信