Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer: An analysis of initial outcomes based on the National Clinical Database.
{"title":"Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer: An analysis of initial outcomes based on the National Clinical Database.","authors":"Tomohiro Haruki, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Yasushi Hoshikawa, Hisashi Iwata, Yukio Sato, Kenji Suzuki, Ichiro Yoshino","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-02992-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for primary lung cancer in the initial period after insurance approval in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data source was the National Clinical Database, using four annual datasets (2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) that included information on individuals who underwent lobectomy with lymph-node dissection via robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes by year were analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median console time was reduced by 22 min from 2018 to 2021 (from 171 min to 149 min, respectively). The median overall operative time was also reduced by 29 min from 2018 to 2021 (from 245 min to 216 min, respectively). The conversion rate from robotic to other approaches was 3.5% in 2018 and 2.4% in 2021, with the frequency decreasing each year. The incidence of postoperative complications ranged from 14.6% to 16.6%, and the 90-day mortality rate ranged from 0.3% to 0.5%, with no remarkable change within the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The initial perioperative outcomes of RATS for lung cancer in Japan were favorable. Further accumulation of cases and comparative analyses of long-term outcomes with other approaches are expected.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-02992-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for primary lung cancer in the initial period after insurance approval in Japan.
Methods: The data source was the National Clinical Database, using four annual datasets (2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) that included information on individuals who underwent lobectomy with lymph-node dissection via robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary lung cancer. Clinicopathological features and perioperative outcomes by year were analyzed descriptively.
Results: The median console time was reduced by 22 min from 2018 to 2021 (from 171 min to 149 min, respectively). The median overall operative time was also reduced by 29 min from 2018 to 2021 (from 245 min to 216 min, respectively). The conversion rate from robotic to other approaches was 3.5% in 2018 and 2.4% in 2021, with the frequency decreasing each year. The incidence of postoperative complications ranged from 14.6% to 16.6%, and the 90-day mortality rate ranged from 0.3% to 0.5%, with no remarkable change within the study period.
Conclusions: The initial perioperative outcomes of RATS for lung cancer in Japan were favorable. Further accumulation of cases and comparative analyses of long-term outcomes with other approaches are expected.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.