{"title":"Explaining resilience in response to potential traumatic event: Sense of coherence and trajectories of anxiety during COVID-19.","authors":"Adi Mana, Yossi Mana, Shifra Sagy","doi":"10.1037/tra0001883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Longitudinal studies have shown that most individuals can stay well in response to potential traumatic events (PTEs). However, the mechanisms underlying such resilience are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study integrates Bonanno's resilience model (Bonanno, 2004) with the salutogenic approach (Antonovsky, 1979) to investigate the association between anxiety trajectories and sense of coherence (SOC). Data were collected from 526 (279 males) Israeli adults via online questionnaires at seven time points between March 2020 and February 2022, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Latent profile analysis identified four anxiety trajectories: (a) resilience (consistently low symptom levels), (b) chronic (consistently elevated symptoms), (c) improving (initially elevated symptoms decreasing over time), and (d) high resilience (sustained absence of anxiety symptoms), providing partial support for Bonanno's model. As expected, SOC significantly differentiated these trajectories, with the \"high-resilience\" group exhibiting the strongest SOC, followed by the \"resilience\" and \"improving\" groups, while the chronic group displayed the weakest SOC levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research underscores SOC as a key predictor of anxiety trajectories in navigating PTEs, shedding light on the importance of individual resilience factors in managing adversity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"1373-1382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Longitudinal studies have shown that most individuals can stay well in response to potential traumatic events (PTEs). However, the mechanisms underlying such resilience are still unclear.
Method: This study integrates Bonanno's resilience model (Bonanno, 2004) with the salutogenic approach (Antonovsky, 1979) to investigate the association between anxiety trajectories and sense of coherence (SOC). Data were collected from 526 (279 males) Israeli adults via online questionnaires at seven time points between March 2020 and February 2022, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results: Latent profile analysis identified four anxiety trajectories: (a) resilience (consistently low symptom levels), (b) chronic (consistently elevated symptoms), (c) improving (initially elevated symptoms decreasing over time), and (d) high resilience (sustained absence of anxiety symptoms), providing partial support for Bonanno's model. As expected, SOC significantly differentiated these trajectories, with the "high-resilience" group exhibiting the strongest SOC, followed by the "resilience" and "improving" groups, while the chronic group displayed the weakest SOC levels.
Conclusions: This research underscores SOC as a key predictor of anxiety trajectories in navigating PTEs, shedding light on the importance of individual resilience factors in managing adversity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy.
The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including:
-Psychological treatments and effects
-Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma
-Assessment and diagnosis of trauma
-Pathophysiology of trauma reactions
-Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations)
-Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies
-Neuroimaging studies
-Trauma and cultural competence