Mental health services in jail: Identifying and quantifying barriers to implementation.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Faith Scanlon, Robert D Morgan
{"title":"Mental health services in jail: Identifying and quantifying barriers to implementation.","authors":"Faith Scanlon, Robert D Morgan","doi":"10.1037/ser0000945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although jails are the largest provider of mental health care nationally, access to treatment in U.S. jails is limited. Limited empirical information on factors impacting the implementation of mental health services in jail may be contributing to low treatment rates. We documented potential barriers impacting the provision of a brief cognitive-behavioral group-based intervention for people with serious mental illness in jail, including the rates of participants' recruitment, as well as starting and completing the intervention; time required for each group from recruitment to completion; and the types and frequencies of obstacles encountered during treatment sessions. We organized the barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. All potential treatment recipients' questions prior to treatment, and reasons provided for not starting the treatment, were also logged and analyzed using content analysis and frequency counts; tables of the themes, frequencies, and examples of participant concerns are presented. These results suggest that although many participants were interested in and incarcerated for sufficient time to complete the intervention, relatively few participants were able to begin the groups (44%). Over 150 obstacles to treatment were encountered during treatment provision (including recurring issues with client transportation within the facility and facility lockdown). Understanding participants' progression through the study (recruitment, start, completion), their questions and reasons for not participating, and interruptions to the sessions provide important information for increasing the usability of mental health care in jails. The current findings can improve the implementation of needed evidence-based treatment in this carceral setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although jails are the largest provider of mental health care nationally, access to treatment in U.S. jails is limited. Limited empirical information on factors impacting the implementation of mental health services in jail may be contributing to low treatment rates. We documented potential barriers impacting the provision of a brief cognitive-behavioral group-based intervention for people with serious mental illness in jail, including the rates of participants' recruitment, as well as starting and completing the intervention; time required for each group from recruitment to completion; and the types and frequencies of obstacles encountered during treatment sessions. We organized the barriers according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. All potential treatment recipients' questions prior to treatment, and reasons provided for not starting the treatment, were also logged and analyzed using content analysis and frequency counts; tables of the themes, frequencies, and examples of participant concerns are presented. These results suggest that although many participants were interested in and incarcerated for sufficient time to complete the intervention, relatively few participants were able to begin the groups (44%). Over 150 obstacles to treatment were encountered during treatment provision (including recurring issues with client transportation within the facility and facility lockdown). Understanding participants' progression through the study (recruitment, start, completion), their questions and reasons for not participating, and interruptions to the sessions provide important information for increasing the usability of mental health care in jails. The current findings can improve the implementation of needed evidence-based treatment in this carceral setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信