Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Intervention Master Your Worries With Telephone Coaching for Anxious Finnish Children Aged 10-13 Years: A Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Andre Sourander, Tarja Korpilahti-Leino, Katri Kaajalaakso, Terja Ristkari, Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, Tiia Ståhlberg, Terhi Luntamo
{"title":"Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Intervention Master Your Worries With Telephone Coaching for Anxious Finnish Children Aged 10-13 Years: A Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Andre Sourander, Tarja Korpilahti-Leino, Katri Kaajalaakso, Terja Ristkari, Susanna Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki, Tiia Ståhlberg, Terhi Luntamo","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>No previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) among children below age 13 years screened at the population level. This study was an open, 2 parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), stratified by sex, that compared ICBT with telephone coaching vs an educational control.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Altogether 465 children (mean age = 11.5 years, SD = 1.0 years, 71.4% girls) were randomly allocated to ICBT or psychoeducation. The 10-week ICBT included weekly digital material and exercises and weekly telephone calls. Assessments comprised child and parent reports on anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders questionnaire [SCARED]), impacts of anxiety, quality of life, comorbidity, and parental mental health assessed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICBT group yielded significantly higher improvement in primary outcomes (SCARED total scores) when compared with control group in the child reports (p = .04, Cohen d = 0.17) but not in the parent reports (p = .41, d = 0.03). The ICBT group had significantly higher improvement in several secondary measures of outcome, including child-reported SCARED generalized anxiety (p = .047, d = 0.09), separation anxiety (p = .004, d = 0.40), social anxiety (p = .007, d = 0.27), the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire total score (p = .002, d = 0.22), emotional difficulties (p = .02, d = 0.20), hyperactivity (p = .003, d = 0.19), and quality of life (p = .02, d = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When children were screened at the population level for anxiety and enrolled in this RCT study of ICBT combined with telephone guidance, they showed efficacy in improving anxiety and quality of life. These findings are encouraging when developing early population-based intervention strategies for childhood anxiety.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration information: </strong>A Randomized Controlled Study of Digitalized Cognitive-behavioral Intervention for Childhood Anxiety; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03310489.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.11.024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: No previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) among children below age 13 years screened at the population level. This study was an open, 2 parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), stratified by sex, that compared ICBT with telephone coaching vs an educational control.

Method: Altogether 465 children (mean age = 11.5 years, SD = 1.0 years, 71.4% girls) were randomly allocated to ICBT or psychoeducation. The 10-week ICBT included weekly digital material and exercises and weekly telephone calls. Assessments comprised child and parent reports on anxiety (Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders questionnaire [SCARED]), impacts of anxiety, quality of life, comorbidity, and parental mental health assessed at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.

Results: The ICBT group yielded significantly higher improvement in primary outcomes (SCARED total scores) when compared with control group in the child reports (p = .04, Cohen d = 0.17) but not in the parent reports (p = .41, d = 0.03). The ICBT group had significantly higher improvement in several secondary measures of outcome, including child-reported SCARED generalized anxiety (p = .047, d = 0.09), separation anxiety (p = .004, d = 0.40), social anxiety (p = .007, d = 0.27), the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire total score (p = .002, d = 0.22), emotional difficulties (p = .02, d = 0.20), hyperactivity (p = .003, d = 0.19), and quality of life (p = .02, d = 0.16).

Conclusion: When children were screened at the population level for anxiety and enrolled in this RCT study of ICBT combined with telephone guidance, they showed efficacy in improving anxiety and quality of life. These findings are encouraging when developing early population-based intervention strategies for childhood anxiety.

Clinical trial registration information: A Randomized Controlled Study of Digitalized Cognitive-behavioral Intervention for Childhood Anxiety; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03310489.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信