The Use of Transperineal Ultrasonography to Compare Relevant Factors for Postpartum Urinary Incontinence Related to Different Modes of Delivery.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Qing Feng, Kun Wang, Wan T Xu, Jian M Huang, Hui H Yang, Yu He
{"title":"The Use of Transperineal Ultrasonography to Compare Relevant Factors for Postpartum Urinary Incontinence Related to Different Modes of Delivery.","authors":"Qing Feng, Kun Wang, Wan T Xu, Jian M Huang, Hui H Yang, Yu He","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06073-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Studies concerning the similarities and differences in relevant factors for PPUI in puerpera with delivery modes are scarce. This study aimed to investigate relevant factors for PPUI among primiparas grouped by different delivery modes using transperineal ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study. Seven hundred thirty-eight primiparas were included and their clinical and ultrasonographic data were collected. First, they were divided into the UI group (n = 233) and non-UI group (n = 505). Then all participants were redivided into the vaginal delivery without episiotomy group (n = 271), the vaginal delivery with episiotomy group (n = 158), and the cesarean section group (n = 309). Independent relevant factors of PPUI were analyzed with the delivery mode as one of the variables and as a grouping factor, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BMI, delivery modes, vertical distances between the location of bladder neck and the reference line of the inferior symphyseal margin at rest (BSDr), and [bladder neck descent (BND)]/BSDr were independently associated with PPUI in the overall study population. Among the participants grouped by delivery modes, the maternal BMI, BSDr, and retrovesical angle during Valsalva maneuver (RVAv) were independently associated with PPUI in the vaginal delivery without episiotomy group. BND/BSDr was the independent relevant factor of PPUI in the cesarean section group. In the vaginal delivery with episiotomy group, no factors were independently associated with PPUI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The independent relevant factors for PPUI in primiparas varied with delivery modes. Sonographic measurements were independently associated with PPUI related to different delivery modes, acting as differential markers to identify PPUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06073-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Studies concerning the similarities and differences in relevant factors for PPUI in puerpera with delivery modes are scarce. This study aimed to investigate relevant factors for PPUI among primiparas grouped by different delivery modes using transperineal ultrasonography.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Seven hundred thirty-eight primiparas were included and their clinical and ultrasonographic data were collected. First, they were divided into the UI group (n = 233) and non-UI group (n = 505). Then all participants were redivided into the vaginal delivery without episiotomy group (n = 271), the vaginal delivery with episiotomy group (n = 158), and the cesarean section group (n = 309). Independent relevant factors of PPUI were analyzed with the delivery mode as one of the variables and as a grouping factor, respectively.

Results: BMI, delivery modes, vertical distances between the location of bladder neck and the reference line of the inferior symphyseal margin at rest (BSDr), and [bladder neck descent (BND)]/BSDr were independently associated with PPUI in the overall study population. Among the participants grouped by delivery modes, the maternal BMI, BSDr, and retrovesical angle during Valsalva maneuver (RVAv) were independently associated with PPUI in the vaginal delivery without episiotomy group. BND/BSDr was the independent relevant factor of PPUI in the cesarean section group. In the vaginal delivery with episiotomy group, no factors were independently associated with PPUI.

Conclusions: The independent relevant factors for PPUI in primiparas varied with delivery modes. Sonographic measurements were independently associated with PPUI related to different delivery modes, acting as differential markers to identify PPUI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信