The Goal Processing Scale: cognitive correlates of an ecologically valid measure of executive functioning in mild traumatic brain injury.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Jillian M Tessier, Maria Kryza-Lacombe, Rachel Santiago, Gary Abrams, Anthony Chen, Scott Rome, Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian
{"title":"The Goal Processing Scale: cognitive correlates of an ecologically valid measure of executive functioning in mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Jillian M Tessier, Maria Kryza-Lacombe, Rachel Santiago, Gary Abrams, Anthony Chen, Scott Rome, Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to further validate the Goal Processing Scale (GPS), an ecologically valid functional assessment of executive functioning requiring planning and executing a complex goal. Veterans (N = 69, mean age = 44.5 years) with a history of chronic mild traumatic brain injury and self-reported cognitive difficulties completed the GPS and neuropsychological measures of working memory, sustained attention, mental flexibility, inhibition, and memory during participation in one of three studies. Associations between overall GPS performance and composite neuropsychological measures of attention/executive functioning and memory were significant and medium-to-large in magnitude. Associations of similar magnitude also emerged between subcomponents of the GPS (e.g. self-monitoring, attentional switching, attention maintenance) and neuropsychological subdomains (e.g. mental flexibility, inhibition, working memory). Results suggest that the GPS facilitates structured assessment of goal-directed performance requiring integration of multiple executive functioning subdomains. The GPS may be valuable in assessing and predicting real-world functional difficulties not captured by traditional neuropsychological assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"48 1","pages":"73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to further validate the Goal Processing Scale (GPS), an ecologically valid functional assessment of executive functioning requiring planning and executing a complex goal. Veterans (N = 69, mean age = 44.5 years) with a history of chronic mild traumatic brain injury and self-reported cognitive difficulties completed the GPS and neuropsychological measures of working memory, sustained attention, mental flexibility, inhibition, and memory during participation in one of three studies. Associations between overall GPS performance and composite neuropsychological measures of attention/executive functioning and memory were significant and medium-to-large in magnitude. Associations of similar magnitude also emerged between subcomponents of the GPS (e.g. self-monitoring, attentional switching, attention maintenance) and neuropsychological subdomains (e.g. mental flexibility, inhibition, working memory). Results suggest that the GPS facilitates structured assessment of goal-directed performance requiring integration of multiple executive functioning subdomains. The GPS may be valuable in assessing and predicting real-world functional difficulties not captured by traditional neuropsychological assessment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信