Blood pressure in human large cerebral arteries: a feasibility study.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00825.2024
Leena N Shoemaker, Tyson Matern, Farah Kamar, Keith St Lawrence, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Mario Zanaty, J Kevin Shoemaker
{"title":"Blood pressure in human large cerebral arteries: a feasibility study.","authors":"Leena N Shoemaker, Tyson Matern, Farah Kamar, Keith St Lawrence, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Mario Zanaty, J Kevin Shoemaker","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00825.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of direct measures of brain blood pressure (BBP) has severely restricted understanding of cerebral pressure-flow relationships and their control. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of directly measuring BBP and its pulsatility between the aorta and middle cerebral artery (MCA) during elective endovascular surgical procedures. We report five case studies (four female, 61 ± 13 yr; means ± SD) of patients undergoing cerebrovascular interventional procedures for aneurysm and stenoses, using direct BBP measures with the COMET 2 pressure guidewire system (Boston Scientific). Patients were supine, intubated, and under anesthesia. The sensor wire was inserted via the femoral artery, measuring, as feasible, blood pressure (BP) in the aorta to MCA vascular segments, referenced to the radial artery BP waveform (arterial catheter). Mean arterial pressure varied between the radial (80 ± 18 mmHg), internal carotid artery (ICA; 70 ± 25 mmHg), and MCA (62 ± 29 mmHg), and marked interindividual heterogeneity was observed. Pulse pressure was higher in the radial artery (68 ± 23 mmHg) compared with the intracranial ICA (ICAi; 43 ± 29 mmHg) and MCA (M1; 25 ± 12 mmHg) segments. Direct measures of BBP in humans are feasible in this interventional surgery model. Although limited by the small sample size, the results suggest a heterogenous pattern of change between systemic and brain measures of blood pressure and pulse pressure.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> We explored the feasibility of making direct measures of blood pressure in the large arteries at the base of the brain in humans. Measures were made with an optical sensor positioned in the aorta, common carotid, internal carotid artery external to the cranium, internal carotid artery within the cranium, and/or middle cerebral artery (MCA), M1 segment. Measures varied across individuals, as did the pressure gradient from systemic pressures to those in the MCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"693-698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00825.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of direct measures of brain blood pressure (BBP) has severely restricted understanding of cerebral pressure-flow relationships and their control. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of directly measuring BBP and its pulsatility between the aorta and middle cerebral artery (MCA) during elective endovascular surgical procedures. We report five case studies (four female, 61 ± 13 yr; means ± SD) of patients undergoing cerebrovascular interventional procedures for aneurysm and stenoses, using direct BBP measures with the COMET 2 pressure guidewire system (Boston Scientific). Patients were supine, intubated, and under anesthesia. The sensor wire was inserted via the femoral artery, measuring, as feasible, blood pressure (BP) in the aorta to MCA vascular segments, referenced to the radial artery BP waveform (arterial catheter). Mean arterial pressure varied between the radial (80 ± 18 mmHg), internal carotid artery (ICA; 70 ± 25 mmHg), and MCA (62 ± 29 mmHg), and marked interindividual heterogeneity was observed. Pulse pressure was higher in the radial artery (68 ± 23 mmHg) compared with the intracranial ICA (ICAi; 43 ± 29 mmHg) and MCA (M1; 25 ± 12 mmHg) segments. Direct measures of BBP in humans are feasible in this interventional surgery model. Although limited by the small sample size, the results suggest a heterogenous pattern of change between systemic and brain measures of blood pressure and pulse pressure.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We explored the feasibility of making direct measures of blood pressure in the large arteries at the base of the brain in humans. Measures were made with an optical sensor positioned in the aorta, common carotid, internal carotid artery external to the cranium, internal carotid artery within the cranium, and/or middle cerebral artery (MCA), M1 segment. Measures varied across individuals, as did the pressure gradient from systemic pressures to those in the MCA.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信