Survey to assess present practice and address challenges in gynaecological brachytherapy in Australia and New Zealand.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Mollie Kain, Geetha Govindarajulu, Carol Johnson, April Xu-Holland, Carminia Lapuz
{"title":"Survey to assess present practice and address challenges in gynaecological brachytherapy in Australia and New Zealand.","authors":"Mollie Kain, Geetha Govindarajulu, Carol Johnson, April Xu-Holland, Carminia Lapuz","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This survey assessed gynaecological brachytherapy caseloads, local training requirements and quality assurance processes across Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was developed by the Gynaecological Oncology Radiation Oncology Collaboration (GOROC) and emailed to all centres offering gynaecological brachytherapy across Australia and New Zealand. It covered 9 areas including caseloads per centre and per radiation oncologist, techniques practised, local training requirements and quality assurance processes over a 2-year period - 2019 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 18 out of 25 centres. All centres offered vaginal vault brachytherapy and 89% treated an average of at least 10 patients per annum. Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy was offered at 89% of centres of which 31% treated less than an average of 10 patients per annum and 23% of radiation oncologists did less than an average of 5 or more insertions per annum as recommended in the GOROC guidelines. Most centres required only Fellowship from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist to practice gynaecological brachytherapy. Peer review of volumes and dosimetry was routinely performed in 28% and 17% of centres, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey adds to the limited literature available regarding practice patterns of brachytherapy worldwide. Ensuring adequate training and robust quality assurance processes with volume and dosimetry review may support all centres and clinicians to continue to safely offer this complex technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This survey assessed gynaecological brachytherapy caseloads, local training requirements and quality assurance processes across Australia and New Zealand.

Methods: The survey was developed by the Gynaecological Oncology Radiation Oncology Collaboration (GOROC) and emailed to all centres offering gynaecological brachytherapy across Australia and New Zealand. It covered 9 areas including caseloads per centre and per radiation oncologist, techniques practised, local training requirements and quality assurance processes over a 2-year period - 2019 and 2020.

Results: The response rate was 18 out of 25 centres. All centres offered vaginal vault brachytherapy and 89% treated an average of at least 10 patients per annum. Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy was offered at 89% of centres of which 31% treated less than an average of 10 patients per annum and 23% of radiation oncologists did less than an average of 5 or more insertions per annum as recommended in the GOROC guidelines. Most centres required only Fellowship from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologist to practice gynaecological brachytherapy. Peer review of volumes and dosimetry was routinely performed in 28% and 17% of centres, respectively.

Conclusion: This survey adds to the limited literature available regarding practice patterns of brachytherapy worldwide. Ensuring adequate training and robust quality assurance processes with volume and dosimetry review may support all centres and clinicians to continue to safely offer this complex technique.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信