Comparison of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Clonidine and Trihexyphenidyl in Clozapine-Induced Hypersalivation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001968
Puangpet Pansawat, Wattanapong Pansawat, Sipanut Silaket, Teeraporn Sadira Supapaan, Tuanthon Boonlue
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Clonidine and Trihexyphenidyl in Clozapine-Induced Hypersalivation.","authors":"Puangpet Pansawat, Wattanapong Pansawat, Sipanut Silaket, Teeraporn Sadira Supapaan, Tuanthon Boonlue","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000001968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/background: </strong>Clozapine-induced hypersalivation is one of the most common bothersome adverse reactions of clozapine. The management strategies for this condition remain inadequately studied and understood. The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of (1) trihexyphenidyl 5 mg/d, (2) clonidine 0.15 mg/d, or (3) a reduction of clozapine dosage by 25 to 50 mg/d for managing clozapine-induced hypersalivation.</p><p><strong>Methods/procedures: </strong>A randomized, open-label, non-placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) and the Nocturnal Hypersalivation Rating Scale (NHRS) at baseline, week 4, and week 8. Quality of life assessed using the pharmaceutical therapy for quality of life short version and adverse drug reactions were recorded as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Findings/results: </strong>A total of 67 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. By week 8, significant reductions in DSFS and NHRS scores were observed in all groups, with clonidine showing the greatest improvement. Trihexyphenidyl was also effective, whereas reducing clozapine dose resulted in more modest improvements. Quality of life improved significantly across all groups, with the greatest improvement observed in the clonidine group. The most common adverse effects were dry mouth, constipation, drowsiness, and dizziness.</p><p><strong>Implications/conclusions: </strong>Clonidine and trihexyphenidyl appear to be more effective options for managing clozapine-induced hypersalivation compared to clozapine dose reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"76-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000001968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/background: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation is one of the most common bothersome adverse reactions of clozapine. The management strategies for this condition remain inadequately studied and understood. The objective of the study is to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of (1) trihexyphenidyl 5 mg/d, (2) clonidine 0.15 mg/d, or (3) a reduction of clozapine dosage by 25 to 50 mg/d for managing clozapine-induced hypersalivation.

Methods/procedures: A randomized, open-label, non-placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from December 2023 to May 2024. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Primary outcomes were assessed using the Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) and the Nocturnal Hypersalivation Rating Scale (NHRS) at baseline, week 4, and week 8. Quality of life assessed using the pharmaceutical therapy for quality of life short version and adverse drug reactions were recorded as secondary outcomes.

Findings/results: A total of 67 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. By week 8, significant reductions in DSFS and NHRS scores were observed in all groups, with clonidine showing the greatest improvement. Trihexyphenidyl was also effective, whereas reducing clozapine dose resulted in more modest improvements. Quality of life improved significantly across all groups, with the greatest improvement observed in the clonidine group. The most common adverse effects were dry mouth, constipation, drowsiness, and dizziness.

Implications/conclusions: Clonidine and trihexyphenidyl appear to be more effective options for managing clozapine-induced hypersalivation compared to clozapine dose reduction.

可乐定与三苯基治疗氯氮平性高涎症的疗效及耐受性比较。
目的/背景:氯氮平引起的唾液过多是氯氮平最常见的不良反应之一。这种情况的管理策略仍然没有得到充分的研究和理解。该研究的目的是比较(1)三己苯基5mg /d,(2)可乐定0.15 mg/d,或(3)氯氮平剂量减少25 - 50mg /d对氯氮平诱导的高唾液分泌的有效性和耐受性。方法/程序:一项随机、开放标签、非安慰剂对照的临床试验于2023年12月至2024年5月进行。符合条件的患者随机分为3组中的1组。在基线、第4周和第8周使用流口水严重程度和频率量表(DSFS)和夜间多涎评定量表(NHRS)评估主要结局。使用药物治疗评估的生活质量(短期生活质量)和药物不良反应被记录为次要结局。结果:67例患者随机分为3个治疗组中的1个。到第8周,所有组的DSFS和NHRS评分均显著降低,其中可乐定的改善最大。三己苯肼也有效,而减少氯氮平的剂量则导致更温和的改善。所有组的生活质量都有显著改善,其中可乐定组的改善最大。最常见的不良反应是口干、便秘、嗜睡和头晕。意义/结论:与减少氯氮平剂量相比,可乐定和三苯基似乎是治疗氯氮平诱导的高涎症更有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信