The Effects of Augmented Feedback, Focus of Attention, and Monetary Reward on Vertical Jump Height: A Replication Study.

Q1 Health Professions
Javad Bakhshinejad, Jasmin Hutchinson, Jennifer Murphy, Lydia Trainor, Sarah Friedman, Nicholas Coker
{"title":"The Effects of Augmented Feedback, Focus of Attention, and Monetary Reward on Vertical Jump Height: A Replication Study.","authors":"Javad Bakhshinejad, Jasmin Hutchinson, Jennifer Murphy, Lydia Trainor, Sarah Friedman, Nicholas Coker","doi":"10.70252/NKKY8370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproducibility and replicability of published empirical scientific evidence are fundamental for verifying key findings, identifying errors and/or boundary conditions, and upholding rigorous research standards. For this replication study, the primary goal was to assess the replicability of the findings from Wälchli et al. (2016), which investigated the role of augmented feedback (AF), external focus of attention (EF), and reward (RE), as well as a combination of these conditions on countermovement jump height. The original study sample included 18 resistance-trained male and female participants, while this replication included 38 (19 male, 19 female). Participants performed maximal countermovement jumps in six different conditions: neutral (NE), aF, RE, aF + EF, aF + RE, and aF + EF + RE. Results showed a non-significant effect of condition on jump height (<i>p</i> = 0.612, η<sub>p</sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.015) which was in contrast to the original study. Furthermore, the replication effect size was not compatible with the original effect size estimate as it was significantly smaller. There was also no significant effect of condition on muscle excitation or kinetic variables. The present study demonstrated that each combination of AF, EF, and RE did not affect vertical jump performance. Therefore, we were unable to replicate the findings from the original study in this close replication.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 7","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/NKKY8370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproducibility and replicability of published empirical scientific evidence are fundamental for verifying key findings, identifying errors and/or boundary conditions, and upholding rigorous research standards. For this replication study, the primary goal was to assess the replicability of the findings from Wälchli et al. (2016), which investigated the role of augmented feedback (AF), external focus of attention (EF), and reward (RE), as well as a combination of these conditions on countermovement jump height. The original study sample included 18 resistance-trained male and female participants, while this replication included 38 (19 male, 19 female). Participants performed maximal countermovement jumps in six different conditions: neutral (NE), aF, RE, aF + EF, aF + RE, and aF + EF + RE. Results showed a non-significant effect of condition on jump height (p = 0.612, ηp 2 = 0.015) which was in contrast to the original study. Furthermore, the replication effect size was not compatible with the original effect size estimate as it was significantly smaller. There was also no significant effect of condition on muscle excitation or kinetic variables. The present study demonstrated that each combination of AF, EF, and RE did not affect vertical jump performance. Therefore, we were unable to replicate the findings from the original study in this close replication.

增强反馈、注意力集中和金钱奖励对垂直跳跃高度的影响:一项重复研究。
已发表的经验科学证据的再现性和可复制性是验证关键发现、识别错误和/或边界条件以及维护严格的研究标准的基础。对于这项重复性研究,主要目标是评估Wälchli等人(2016)研究结果的可重复性,该研究调查了增强反馈(AF)、外部注意力焦点(EF)和奖励(RE)的作用,以及这些条件对反动作跳跃高度的组合。最初的研究样本包括18名接受阻力训练的男性和女性参与者,而这次复制的样本包括38名(19名男性,19名女性)。受试者在中性(NE)、aF、RE、aF + EF、aF + RE、aF + EF + RE、aF + EF + RE 6种不同的条件下进行最大反动作跳跃。结果显示,条件对跳跃高度的影响不显著(p = 0.612, ηp 2 = 0.015),与原始研究相反。此外,复制效应量与原始效应量估计值不相容,因为它明显更小。条件对肌肉兴奋或动力学变量也无显著影响。本研究表明,AF、EF和RE的每种组合都不影响垂直跳跃性能。因此,我们无法在这个近距离复制中复制原始研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信