The discordance of biomarkers in primary tumor and synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis of the breast cancer, and its clinical significance in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2025.2464199

Ali Kaan Sanal, Umit Turan, Ahmet Yugruk, Zeynel Abidin Taş, Oktay Irkorucu, Omer Taskin

{"title":"The discordance of biomarkers in primary tumor and synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis of the breast cancer, and its clinical significance in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy.","authors":"Ali Kaan Sanal, Umit Turan, Ahmet Yugruk, Zeynel Abidin Taş, Oktay Irkorucu, Omer Taskin","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2464199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study explores the disparity in ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 status between primary breast tumors (PBT) and axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) at initial admission in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).Research design and methods: Demographic-clinicopathological characteristics and histopathological response to NAC in both PBT and ALNM were recorded. Immunohistochemical analysis of ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki67 was performed separately in PBT and ALNM, with discordance rates compared. The disparity in biomarkers was assessed in relation to the histopathological response to NAC in both PBT and ALNM.Results: In 96 female patients, discordance rates between PBT and ALNM were 16.67% for ER, 16.67% for PR, 20.83% for HER-2, and 15.63% for Ki-67. Statistically significant differences in ER and PR discordance between PBT and ALNM were observed. Additionally, a significant difference in histopathological response to NAC was noted based on ER discordance.Conclusion: Precise assessment of ER and HER-2 status in axillary lymph node biopsy specimens is crucial in breast cancer patients with ALNM, potentially optimizing systemic and surgical treatment selection.","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2464199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study explores the disparity in ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67 status between primary breast tumors (PBT) and axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) at initial admission in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Research design and methods: Demographic-clinicopathological characteristics and histopathological response to NAC in both PBT and ALNM were recorded. Immunohistochemical analysis of ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki67 was performed separately in PBT and ALNM, with discordance rates compared. The disparity in biomarkers was assessed in relation to the histopathological response to NAC in both PBT and ALNM.

Results: In 96 female patients, discordance rates between PBT and ALNM were 16.67% for ER, 16.67% for PR, 20.83% for HER-2, and 15.63% for Ki-67. Statistically significant differences in ER and PR discordance between PBT and ALNM were observed. Additionally, a significant difference in histopathological response to NAC was noted based on ER discordance.

Conclusion: Precise assessment of ER and HER-2 status in axillary lymph node biopsy specimens is crucial in breast cancer patients with ALNM, potentially optimizing systemic and surgical treatment selection.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 医学-肿瘤学

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

3.00%

发文量

100

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.