Aloe vera vs chlorhexidine in preventing alveolar osteitis.

IF 1.9
Bioinformation Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.6026/973206300200993
Shruti Ajmera, Sunil Sharma, Amit Kumar Sharma, Vikram Sharma, S Meera Petchiammal, Shraddha Sinha
{"title":"Aloe vera vs chlorhexidine in preventing alveolar osteitis.","authors":"Shruti Ajmera, Sunil Sharma, Amit Kumar Sharma, Vikram Sharma, S Meera Petchiammal, Shraddha Sinha","doi":"10.6026/973206300200993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a common and painful complication following tooth extraction or surgical excision, necessitating early treatment to minimize costs, morbidity, and frequent dental visits. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most widely used antiseptic, while Aloe Vera, a natural herbal plant, is gaining popularity in dentistry due to its minimal side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of normal saline, Aloe Vera, and chlorhexidine mouthwashes in reducing the incidence of AO after lower third molar surgery. In a randomized controlled trial, 150 patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (Chlorhexidine Mouthwash), Group 2 (Aloe Vera Mouthwash), and Group 3 (Normal Saline, placebo). Postoperative assessments on the 2nd and 7th days measured Trismus Grading, VAS, Wound Dehiscence, and AO. The results showed no significant difference in the occurrence of AO and Trismus grading between groups (p = 0.031 and 0.78, respectively), but wound dehiscence significantly differed (p = 0.013). While the VAS score on the 2nd day showed no significant difference, by the 7th day, chlorhexidine demonstrated better pain reduction than Aloe Vera. Although both mouthwashes were effective in reducing AO, chlorhexidine was more effective in reducing wound dehiscence and pain by the 7th day post-surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"20 9","pages":"993-997"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300200993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a common and painful complication following tooth extraction or surgical excision, necessitating early treatment to minimize costs, morbidity, and frequent dental visits. Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most widely used antiseptic, while Aloe Vera, a natural herbal plant, is gaining popularity in dentistry due to its minimal side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of normal saline, Aloe Vera, and chlorhexidine mouthwashes in reducing the incidence of AO after lower third molar surgery. In a randomized controlled trial, 150 patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (Chlorhexidine Mouthwash), Group 2 (Aloe Vera Mouthwash), and Group 3 (Normal Saline, placebo). Postoperative assessments on the 2nd and 7th days measured Trismus Grading, VAS, Wound Dehiscence, and AO. The results showed no significant difference in the occurrence of AO and Trismus grading between groups (p = 0.031 and 0.78, respectively), but wound dehiscence significantly differed (p = 0.013). While the VAS score on the 2nd day showed no significant difference, by the 7th day, chlorhexidine demonstrated better pain reduction than Aloe Vera. Although both mouthwashes were effective in reducing AO, chlorhexidine was more effective in reducing wound dehiscence and pain by the 7th day post-surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioinformation
Bioinformation MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信