Selection of rectal cancer patients for organ preservation after neoadjuvant therapy: value of T2W-MRI signal intensity.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1177/02841851241309008
Denise J van der Reijd, Xinde Ou, Rebecca Ap Dijkhoff, Silvia G Drago, Renaud Tissier, Joost Jm van Griethuysen, Doenja Mj Lambregts, Frans Ch Bakers, Janneke B Houwers, Regina Gh Beets-Tan, Monique Maas
{"title":"Selection of rectal cancer patients for organ preservation after neoadjuvant therapy: value of T2W-MRI signal intensity.","authors":"Denise J van der Reijd, Xinde Ou, Rebecca Ap Dijkhoff, Silvia G Drago, Renaud Tissier, Joost Jm van Griethuysen, Doenja Mj Lambregts, Frans Ch Bakers, Janneke B Houwers, Regina Gh Beets-Tan, Monique Maas","doi":"10.1177/02841851241309008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOrgan preservation strategies have been widely implemented for rectal cancer (RC) patients with a good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). However, to accurately select eligible patients remains one of the key diagnostic challenges.PurposeTo identify eligible candidates for organ preservation after nCRT in RC, by identifying luminal response and lymph node metastases, based on T2W-MRI signal intensities.Material and MethodsA total of 171 RC patients underwent MRI before and after nCRT. The primary tumor (pre-nCRT-MRI) and tumor remnant (post-nCRT-MRI) were manually delineated. Ten signal intensity features were extracted and delta features were calculated by subtraction. Histopathological evaluation classified patients as lymph node negative (ypN0) or positive (ypN+), and as good responders (GR) or partial/poor responders (PR). Five models were constructed based on the timing of imaging.Results42/170 (25%) patients had ypN+, and 72/152 (47%) patients were considered GR. Univariate analysis showed 13/40 signal intensity features were significantly different between luminal response groups and 4/40 between nodal response groups. In multivariate analysis, the <i>Baseline + Restaging-model</i> yielded the best results for both luminal and nodal response with AUCs in the test set of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95) and 0.74 (95% CI=0.59-0.90), respectively. To identify PR, the <i>Delta-model</i> yielded an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI=0.56-0.89) and the <i>Delta + Restaging-model</i> an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95), both were not able to differentiate nodal response. The models including solely baseline or restaging features were not predictive.ConclusionT2W-MRI signal intensities of the primary rectal tumor are related to the luminal and nodal response after nCRT and hold promise to identify patients eligible for organ preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241309008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOrgan preservation strategies have been widely implemented for rectal cancer (RC) patients with a good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). However, to accurately select eligible patients remains one of the key diagnostic challenges.PurposeTo identify eligible candidates for organ preservation after nCRT in RC, by identifying luminal response and lymph node metastases, based on T2W-MRI signal intensities.Material and MethodsA total of 171 RC patients underwent MRI before and after nCRT. The primary tumor (pre-nCRT-MRI) and tumor remnant (post-nCRT-MRI) were manually delineated. Ten signal intensity features were extracted and delta features were calculated by subtraction. Histopathological evaluation classified patients as lymph node negative (ypN0) or positive (ypN+), and as good responders (GR) or partial/poor responders (PR). Five models were constructed based on the timing of imaging.Results42/170 (25%) patients had ypN+, and 72/152 (47%) patients were considered GR. Univariate analysis showed 13/40 signal intensity features were significantly different between luminal response groups and 4/40 between nodal response groups. In multivariate analysis, the Baseline + Restaging-model yielded the best results for both luminal and nodal response with AUCs in the test set of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95) and 0.74 (95% CI=0.59-0.90), respectively. To identify PR, the Delta-model yielded an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI=0.56-0.89) and the Delta + Restaging-model an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95), both were not able to differentiate nodal response. The models including solely baseline or restaging features were not predictive.ConclusionT2W-MRI signal intensities of the primary rectal tumor are related to the luminal and nodal response after nCRT and hold promise to identify patients eligible for organ preservation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信