Selection of rectal cancer patients for organ preservation after neoadjuvant therapy: value of T2W-MRI signal intensity.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1177/02841851241309008
Denise J van der Reijd, Xinde Ou, Rebecca Ap Dijkhoff, Silvia G Drago, Renaud Tissier, Joost Jm van Griethuysen, Doenja Mj Lambregts, Frans Ch Bakers, Janneke B Houwers, Regina Gh Beets-Tan, Monique Maas
{"title":"Selection of rectal cancer patients for organ preservation after neoadjuvant therapy: value of T2W-MRI signal intensity.","authors":"Denise J van der Reijd, Xinde Ou, Rebecca Ap Dijkhoff, Silvia G Drago, Renaud Tissier, Joost Jm van Griethuysen, Doenja Mj Lambregts, Frans Ch Bakers, Janneke B Houwers, Regina Gh Beets-Tan, Monique Maas","doi":"10.1177/02841851241309008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOrgan preservation strategies have been widely implemented for rectal cancer (RC) patients with a good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). However, to accurately select eligible patients remains one of the key diagnostic challenges.PurposeTo identify eligible candidates for organ preservation after nCRT in RC, by identifying luminal response and lymph node metastases, based on T2W-MRI signal intensities.Material and MethodsA total of 171 RC patients underwent MRI before and after nCRT. The primary tumor (pre-nCRT-MRI) and tumor remnant (post-nCRT-MRI) were manually delineated. Ten signal intensity features were extracted and delta features were calculated by subtraction. Histopathological evaluation classified patients as lymph node negative (ypN0) or positive (ypN+), and as good responders (GR) or partial/poor responders (PR). Five models were constructed based on the timing of imaging.Results42/170 (25%) patients had ypN+, and 72/152 (47%) patients were considered GR. Univariate analysis showed 13/40 signal intensity features were significantly different between luminal response groups and 4/40 between nodal response groups. In multivariate analysis, the <i>Baseline + Restaging-model</i> yielded the best results for both luminal and nodal response with AUCs in the test set of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95) and 0.74 (95% CI=0.59-0.90), respectively. To identify PR, the <i>Delta-model</i> yielded an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI=0.56-0.89) and the <i>Delta + Restaging-model</i> an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95), both were not able to differentiate nodal response. The models including solely baseline or restaging features were not predictive.ConclusionT2W-MRI signal intensities of the primary rectal tumor are related to the luminal and nodal response after nCRT and hold promise to identify patients eligible for organ preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241309008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOrgan preservation strategies have been widely implemented for rectal cancer (RC) patients with a good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). However, to accurately select eligible patients remains one of the key diagnostic challenges.PurposeTo identify eligible candidates for organ preservation after nCRT in RC, by identifying luminal response and lymph node metastases, based on T2W-MRI signal intensities.Material and MethodsA total of 171 RC patients underwent MRI before and after nCRT. The primary tumor (pre-nCRT-MRI) and tumor remnant (post-nCRT-MRI) were manually delineated. Ten signal intensity features were extracted and delta features were calculated by subtraction. Histopathological evaluation classified patients as lymph node negative (ypN0) or positive (ypN+), and as good responders (GR) or partial/poor responders (PR). Five models were constructed based on the timing of imaging.Results42/170 (25%) patients had ypN+, and 72/152 (47%) patients were considered GR. Univariate analysis showed 13/40 signal intensity features were significantly different between luminal response groups and 4/40 between nodal response groups. In multivariate analysis, the Baseline + Restaging-model yielded the best results for both luminal and nodal response with AUCs in the test set of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95) and 0.74 (95% CI=0.59-0.90), respectively. To identify PR, the Delta-model yielded an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI=0.56-0.89) and the Delta + Restaging-model an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95), both were not able to differentiate nodal response. The models including solely baseline or restaging features were not predictive.ConclusionT2W-MRI signal intensities of the primary rectal tumor are related to the luminal and nodal response after nCRT and hold promise to identify patients eligible for organ preservation.

直肠癌患者新辅助治疗后器官保存的选择:T2W-MRI信号强度的价值。
背景:对于新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后反应良好的直肠癌(RC)患者,器官保存策略已被广泛实施。然而,准确选择符合条件的患者仍然是诊断的关键挑战之一。目的:基于T2W-MRI信号强度,通过识别腔内反应和淋巴结转移,确定RC术后器官保存的合格候选者。材料与方法:共171例RC患者在nCRT前后行MRI检查。人工划定原发肿瘤(ncrt - mri前)和肿瘤残余(ncrt - mri后)。提取10个信号强度特征,通过减法计算δ特征。组织病理学评估将患者分为淋巴结阴性(ypN0)或阳性(ypN+),良好反应(GR)或部分/不良反应(PR)。根据成像时间构造了5个模型。结果:42/170(25%)患者为ypN+, 72/152(47%)患者为GR。单因素分析显示,腔内反应组间13/40信号强度特征差异显著,淋巴结反应组间4/40信号强度特征差异显著。在多变量分析中,Baseline + reaging -模型在管腔和淋巴结反应方面均获得最佳结果,auc分别为0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95)和0.74 (95% CI=0.59-0.90)。为了识别PR, Delta模型的AUC为0.72 (95% CI=0.56-0.89), Delta + restagg模型的AUC为0.81 (95% CI=0.67-0.95),两者都不能区分淋巴结反应。仅包括基线或再老化特征的模型不具有预测性。结论:T2W-MRI信号强度与nCRT术后管腔和淋巴结反应有关,有望确定适合器官保存的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信