The Challenges of Gender Diversity in Boards of Directors: An Australian Study with Global Implications

IF 4.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Suzanne Young, Karen Farquharson, Daswin De Silva, Paul Mather
{"title":"The Challenges of Gender Diversity in Boards of Directors: An Australian Study with Global Implications","authors":"Suzanne Young,&nbsp;Karen Farquharson,&nbsp;Daswin De Silva,&nbsp;Paul Mather","doi":"10.1002/gch2.202400259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite gender diversity being driven by institutional bodies, companies have been relatively slow to diversify. In this study, it is investigated that how Australian boards select new directors, and how those selection processes affect their recruitment of women. In-depth interviews are conducted of those with first-hand experience of board appointments, followed by the thematic analysis and the application of natural language processing techniques to identify emotions and sentiment associated with these themes. The findings indicate that boards are adopting a social rather than rational approach to board selection. They are using networks, recruitment agencies, skills matrices and pools which on the surface appear to broaden the diversity of board members. But if they are not actively seeking gender diversity these methods can still limit diversity. For women, the lack of progress and barriers of access are resulting in high intensity of negative emotions. A key contribution of the research is the intersection of social approaches to board appointment and social identity theory with the dynamics of gender. Boards need to prioritize diversity for it to be achieved. There is a need for more active methods of recruitment and expansion of the networks and pools where directors are traditionally sought. Institutions can drive change through increasing targets and requiring enhanced reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12646,"journal":{"name":"Global Challenges","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gch2.202400259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202400259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite gender diversity being driven by institutional bodies, companies have been relatively slow to diversify. In this study, it is investigated that how Australian boards select new directors, and how those selection processes affect their recruitment of women. In-depth interviews are conducted of those with first-hand experience of board appointments, followed by the thematic analysis and the application of natural language processing techniques to identify emotions and sentiment associated with these themes. The findings indicate that boards are adopting a social rather than rational approach to board selection. They are using networks, recruitment agencies, skills matrices and pools which on the surface appear to broaden the diversity of board members. But if they are not actively seeking gender diversity these methods can still limit diversity. For women, the lack of progress and barriers of access are resulting in high intensity of negative emotions. A key contribution of the research is the intersection of social approaches to board appointment and social identity theory with the dynamics of gender. Boards need to prioritize diversity for it to be achieved. There is a need for more active methods of recruitment and expansion of the networks and pools where directors are traditionally sought. Institutions can drive change through increasing targets and requiring enhanced reporting.

Abstract Image

董事会性别多样性的挑战:一项具有全球意义的澳大利亚研究
尽管性别多元化是由机构机构推动的,但企业在实现多元化方面一直相对缓慢。在这项研究中,调查了澳大利亚董事会如何选择新董事,以及这些选择过程如何影响他们对女性的招聘。对那些有董事会任命第一手经验的人进行深入访谈,然后进行主题分析和自然语言处理技术的应用,以识别与这些主题相关的情绪和情绪。研究结果表明,董事会在选择董事会时采用的是一种社会性的方法,而非理性的方法。他们正在利用网络、招聘机构、技能矩阵和人才库,表面上看来,这些都扩大了董事会成员的多样性。但如果他们不积极寻求性别多样性,这些方法仍然会限制多样性。对妇女来说,缺乏进展和准入障碍导致了高度强烈的负面情绪。该研究的一个关键贡献是将董事会任命的社会方法和社会认同理论与性别动态相结合。董事会需要优先考虑多样性,才能实现这一目标。有必要采取更积极的方法来征聘和扩大传统上寻求董事的网络和人才库。机构可以通过增加目标和要求加强报告来推动变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Challenges
Global Challenges MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信