Respiratory-Swallow Coordination of Uncued Swallows in Dysphagic and Tracheotomized Patients

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Martin Gerbert, Veronika Segler, Julia Adam, Arneborg Ernst, Benjamin Riebold, Philipp Mittmann, Rainer Seidl
{"title":"Respiratory-Swallow Coordination of Uncued Swallows in Dysphagic and Tracheotomized Patients","authors":"Martin Gerbert,&nbsp;Veronika Segler,&nbsp;Julia Adam,&nbsp;Arneborg Ernst,&nbsp;Benjamin Riebold,&nbsp;Philipp Mittmann,&nbsp;Rainer Seidl","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory-swallow coordination (RSC) in healthy, dysphagic, and subjects with blocked, unblocked or without tracheostomy cannula (TC) over 2 h with focus on unintended deglutition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a single center (cross-sectional) observational study, a total of 65 subjects were included. Swallowing processes were recorded using RehaIngest (Hasomed GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany), combining electromyography (EMG) and bioimpedance (BI) inputs. Group differences were calculated using non-parametric tests, the influences of age and gender were evaluated using regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Respiratory patterns from 3761 swallows were evaluated. Nineteen healthy and 46 dysphagic subjects, including 15 without TC, 15 with blocked TC and 16 with unblocked TC, were recorded. In the dysphagia cohort unblocked and without TC demonstrated increased post-deglutitive expiration (<i>p</i> = 0.012, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a decrease in post-deglutitive inspiration (<i>p</i> = 0.028, <i>p</i> = 0.013) compared with healthy probands. In addition, a higher proportion of subjects demonstrating post-deglutitive expiration was recorded amongst probands with unblocked TC compared to blocked TC (<i>p</i> = 0.012). Neither age nor gender significantly impacted the aforementioned outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our novel cross-sectional study shows that the RSC adapts in a compensatory fashion in the acquired dysphagia cohort. The adaptation depends on the occurrence of dysphagia and the type of TC. If the TC cuff is blocked, patients likely have an inadequate adaptation of the RSC, mainly because of the absence of a transglottic air flow. These findings indicate that RSC and TC care should be closely incorporated into clinical routine to improve dysphagia therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>1</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory-swallow coordination (RSC) in healthy, dysphagic, and subjects with blocked, unblocked or without tracheostomy cannula (TC) over 2 h with focus on unintended deglutition.

Methods

In a single center (cross-sectional) observational study, a total of 65 subjects were included. Swallowing processes were recorded using RehaIngest (Hasomed GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany), combining electromyography (EMG) and bioimpedance (BI) inputs. Group differences were calculated using non-parametric tests, the influences of age and gender were evaluated using regression analysis.

Results

Respiratory patterns from 3761 swallows were evaluated. Nineteen healthy and 46 dysphagic subjects, including 15 without TC, 15 with blocked TC and 16 with unblocked TC, were recorded. In the dysphagia cohort unblocked and without TC demonstrated increased post-deglutitive expiration (p = 0.012, p = 0.001) and a decrease in post-deglutitive inspiration (p = 0.028, p = 0.013) compared with healthy probands. In addition, a higher proportion of subjects demonstrating post-deglutitive expiration was recorded amongst probands with unblocked TC compared to blocked TC (p = 0.012). Neither age nor gender significantly impacted the aforementioned outcomes.

Conclusion

Our novel cross-sectional study shows that the RSC adapts in a compensatory fashion in the acquired dysphagia cohort. The adaptation depends on the occurrence of dysphagia and the type of TC. If the TC cuff is blocked, patients likely have an inadequate adaptation of the RSC, mainly because of the absence of a transglottic air flow. These findings indicate that RSC and TC care should be closely incorporated into clinical routine to improve dysphagia therapy.

Level of Evidence

1

Abstract Image

吞咽困难和气管切开患者未提示吞咽的呼吸-吞咽协调
目的本研究的目的是评估健康、吞咽困难和气管造口插管(TC)阻塞、未阻塞或未阻塞的受试者在2小时内的呼吸吞咽协调(RSC),重点关注意外吞咽。方法采用单中心(横断面)观察性研究,共纳入65名受试者。使用RehaIngest (Hasomed GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany)记录吞咽过程,结合肌电图(EMG)和生物阻抗(BI)输入。采用非参数检验计算组间差异,采用回归分析评估年龄和性别的影响。结果对3761只家燕的呼吸方式进行了评价。健康者19例,吞咽困难者46例,其中无吞咽困难者15例,吞咽困难者15例,吞咽困难者16例。与健康先证相比,未阻塞和未阻塞TC的吞咽困难队列显示吞咽后呼气增加(p = 0.012, p = 0.001),吞咽后吸气减少(p = 0.028, p = 0.013)。此外,在未阻断TC的先证者中,与阻断TC的先证者相比,出现咀嚼后呼气的比例更高(p = 0.012)。年龄和性别对上述结果都没有显著影响。结论:我们新的横断面研究表明,在获得性吞咽困难队列中,RSC以代偿方式适应。这种适应取决于吞咽困难的发生和TC的类型。如果TC袖带阻塞,患者可能对RSC适应不足,主要是因为缺少经声门气流。这些结果表明,RSC和TC护理应紧密结合到临床常规中,以改善吞咽困难的治疗。证据级别1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信