Will China's Carbon Emission Trading Regulation Really Decrease the Green Investment of Firms? A Microperspective on Corporate Governance

IF 12.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tingting Li, Xiangrui Meng, Liukai Wang, Yu Gong
{"title":"Will China's Carbon Emission Trading Regulation Really Decrease the Green Investment of Firms? A Microperspective on Corporate Governance","authors":"Tingting Li,&nbsp;Xiangrui Meng,&nbsp;Liukai Wang,&nbsp;Yu Gong","doi":"10.1002/bse.4103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although China initiated pilot carbon emission trading (CET) regulations in 2014, systematic research specifically examining their impact on corporate green investment expenditure (GIE) and the underlying mechanisms from an internal and external perspective remains limited. To this end, we conducted a quasinatural experiment to investigate how CET regulations affect the GIE of firms in eight high-emission industries. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach and propensity score matching (PSM-DID) on 4117 year-firm observations of listed A-share firms located in China's covered areas from 2010 to 2019, we found that CET regulations have a negative impact on firms' GIE. Further, from the microperspective of internal and external mechanisms of corporate governance, we also find negative moderators of corporate innovation capability and carbon trading market efficiency, respectively. The detailed heterogeneity impacts of the CET policy on the GIE of CET-covered firms in different regions, industries, and ownership types are illustrated. This study systematically analyzes the impact of CET policy on GIE in high-emission industries in China, focusing on the internal and external mechanisms of corporate governance. By doing so, it contributes to the literature in environmental economics and corporate green investment, offering new insights into the effects of regulatory policies on corporate behavior in high-emission sectors. Enterprises should properly deal with the relationship between carbon emission quotas and green investment to realize a virtuous cycle of reasonable GIE and carbon emission reduction targets and ultimately achieve a win–win situation for both the economy and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"34 2","pages":"2222-2238"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bse.4103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.4103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although China initiated pilot carbon emission trading (CET) regulations in 2014, systematic research specifically examining their impact on corporate green investment expenditure (GIE) and the underlying mechanisms from an internal and external perspective remains limited. To this end, we conducted a quasinatural experiment to investigate how CET regulations affect the GIE of firms in eight high-emission industries. Using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach and propensity score matching (PSM-DID) on 4117 year-firm observations of listed A-share firms located in China's covered areas from 2010 to 2019, we found that CET regulations have a negative impact on firms' GIE. Further, from the microperspective of internal and external mechanisms of corporate governance, we also find negative moderators of corporate innovation capability and carbon trading market efficiency, respectively. The detailed heterogeneity impacts of the CET policy on the GIE of CET-covered firms in different regions, industries, and ownership types are illustrated. This study systematically analyzes the impact of CET policy on GIE in high-emission industries in China, focusing on the internal and external mechanisms of corporate governance. By doing so, it contributes to the literature in environmental economics and corporate green investment, offering new insights into the effects of regulatory policies on corporate behavior in high-emission sectors. Enterprises should properly deal with the relationship between carbon emission quotas and green investment to realize a virtuous cycle of reasonable GIE and carbon emission reduction targets and ultimately achieve a win–win situation for both the economy and the environment.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信