Aerodynamic performance and mechanism for a flexible membrane wing encountering a harmonic transverse gust

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Xi He, Siyuan Feng, Qinfeng Guo, Jinjun Wang
{"title":"Aerodynamic performance and mechanism for a flexible membrane wing encountering a harmonic transverse gust","authors":"Xi He,&nbsp;Siyuan Feng,&nbsp;Qinfeng Guo,&nbsp;Jinjun Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00348-025-03966-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To assess the performance of a flexible membrane wing in a harmonic transverse gust, the aerodynamic forces, membrane deformations and surrounding flow fields are synchronously measured. The gust is generated by two periodically pitching airfoils. First, the flexible wing outperforms its rigid counterparts in time-averaged lift, achieving a maximum lift increment of 44.6% at the angle of attack (<i>α</i>) of 16°. The lift-enhancement is attributed to the camber increase and membrane vibration to suppress flow separation—a mechanism analogous to the behavior in steady flow conditions. Second, for the unsteady lift response, the flexible and rigid cambered wings reduce lift fluctuations induced by the gust when 3° ≤ <i>α</i> ≤ 9°, implying a gust alleviation effect. The maximum alleviation of the flexible wing is 32.0% at <i>α</i> = 6°. To elucidate the gust alleviation mechanism, phase-averaged lift and flow fields at <i>α</i> = 6° are investigated. The flow over the flexible wing remains consistently attached, while the rigid plate wing exhibits the evolution of leading-edge vortices (LEVs). These LEVs provide additional lift that helps the rigid plate wing to match the maximum lift of the flexible wing. However, the minimum lift of the plate wing is much smaller. Consequently, the primary reason for the aerodynamic load alleviation is elaborated. However, the inherent resonant vibration of the membrane is a by-product that has a negative impact on the alleviation effect.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":554,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Fluids","volume":"66 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00348-025-03966-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the performance of a flexible membrane wing in a harmonic transverse gust, the aerodynamic forces, membrane deformations and surrounding flow fields are synchronously measured. The gust is generated by two periodically pitching airfoils. First, the flexible wing outperforms its rigid counterparts in time-averaged lift, achieving a maximum lift increment of 44.6% at the angle of attack (α) of 16°. The lift-enhancement is attributed to the camber increase and membrane vibration to suppress flow separation—a mechanism analogous to the behavior in steady flow conditions. Second, for the unsteady lift response, the flexible and rigid cambered wings reduce lift fluctuations induced by the gust when 3° ≤ α ≤ 9°, implying a gust alleviation effect. The maximum alleviation of the flexible wing is 32.0% at α = 6°. To elucidate the gust alleviation mechanism, phase-averaged lift and flow fields at α = 6° are investigated. The flow over the flexible wing remains consistently attached, while the rigid plate wing exhibits the evolution of leading-edge vortices (LEVs). These LEVs provide additional lift that helps the rigid plate wing to match the maximum lift of the flexible wing. However, the minimum lift of the plate wing is much smaller. Consequently, the primary reason for the aerodynamic load alleviation is elaborated. However, the inherent resonant vibration of the membrane is a by-product that has a negative impact on the alleviation effect.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

柔性膜翼遇到谐波横向阵风的气动性能及机理
为了评估柔性膜翼在谐波横向阵风中的性能,同步测量了气动力、膜变形和周围流场。阵风是由两个周期性俯仰翼型产生的。首先,柔性翼在时间平均升力方面优于刚性翼,在攻角(α)为16°时,最大升力增量为44.6%。升力的增加是由于弯曲度的增加和膜的振动抑制了流动分离,这一机制类似于稳定流动条件下的行为。②对于非定常升力响应,当3°≤α≤9°时,柔性和刚性弧形机翼均能减小阵风引起的升力波动,具有缓解阵风的作用;当α = 6°时,柔性翼的最大缓和度为32.0%。为了阐明阵风缓解机制,研究了α = 6°时的相平均升力和流场。柔性翼上的气流始终保持附着,而刚性板翼则表现出前缘涡的演变。这些lev提供额外的升力,帮助刚性板机翼匹配柔性机翼的最大升力。然而,板翼的最小升力要小得多。因此,阐述了气动载荷减轻的主要原因。然而,膜固有的共振振动是一种副产物,对缓解效果有负面影响。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experiments in Fluids
Experiments in Fluids 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Experiments in Fluids examines the advancement, extension, and improvement of new techniques of flow measurement. The journal also publishes contributions that employ existing experimental techniques to gain an understanding of the underlying flow physics in the areas of turbulence, aerodynamics, hydrodynamics, convective heat transfer, combustion, turbomachinery, multi-phase flows, and chemical, biological and geological flows. In addition, readers will find papers that report on investigations combining experimental and analytical/numerical approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信