{"title":"Assessing global ensemble systems’ forecasts of tropical cyclone genesis in differing environmental flow regimes in the western North Pacific","authors":"Yasuhiro Kawabata , Munehiko Yamaguchi , Hironori Fudeyasu , Ryuji Yoshida","doi":"10.1016/j.tcrr.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The forecast probability of tropical cyclone (TC) genesis in the western North Pacific from 2017 to 2020 was investigated using global ensembles from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and the Met Office in the United Kingdom (UKMO). The time of TC genesis was defined as the time the TCs were first recorded in the best-track data (Case 1) and as the time they reached the intensity of a Tropical Storm (Case 2). The results in Case 1 showed that differences between the forecast probability based on each global ensemble were large, even for a 1-day forecast, and that mean probability were from 18 % to 74 %. The forecasts based on the NCEP had a large frequency bias and overpredicted TC genesis events. The results indicated that the representation of genesis events differed greatly between global ensembles. The effectiveness of multiple ensembles was investigated. The results from the threat score and the false alarm ratio indicated that multiple ensembles had skillful forecasts. When the forecast probability was examined for environmental patterns of synoptic low-level flow, the mean 5-day forecast probability was highest for the pattern in the confluence region. The results also showed that the forecast probability was much larger in Case 2 than in Case 1. In all global ensembles, the mean probability with a lead time of up to 1-week was below 10 % for both Case 1 and 2. This result indicates that even with today's operational forecasting systems, it is difficult to regularly predict TC genesis events with a 1-week lead time with high confidence. These results provide a better understanding of TC genesis forecast products in each global ensemble and will be useful information when multiple-ensemble products are created.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44442,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 344-355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Cyclone Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603224000614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The forecast probability of tropical cyclone (TC) genesis in the western North Pacific from 2017 to 2020 was investigated using global ensembles from the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and the Met Office in the United Kingdom (UKMO). The time of TC genesis was defined as the time the TCs were first recorded in the best-track data (Case 1) and as the time they reached the intensity of a Tropical Storm (Case 2). The results in Case 1 showed that differences between the forecast probability based on each global ensemble were large, even for a 1-day forecast, and that mean probability were from 18 % to 74 %. The forecasts based on the NCEP had a large frequency bias and overpredicted TC genesis events. The results indicated that the representation of genesis events differed greatly between global ensembles. The effectiveness of multiple ensembles was investigated. The results from the threat score and the false alarm ratio indicated that multiple ensembles had skillful forecasts. When the forecast probability was examined for environmental patterns of synoptic low-level flow, the mean 5-day forecast probability was highest for the pattern in the confluence region. The results also showed that the forecast probability was much larger in Case 2 than in Case 1. In all global ensembles, the mean probability with a lead time of up to 1-week was below 10 % for both Case 1 and 2. This result indicates that even with today's operational forecasting systems, it is difficult to regularly predict TC genesis events with a 1-week lead time with high confidence. These results provide a better understanding of TC genesis forecast products in each global ensemble and will be useful information when multiple-ensemble products are created.
期刊介绍:
Tropical Cyclone Research and Review is an international journal focusing on tropical cyclone monitoring, forecasting, and research as well as associated hydrological effects and disaster risk reduction. This journal is edited and published by the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee (TC) and the Shanghai Typhoon Institute of the China Meteorology Administration (STI/CMA). Contributions from all tropical cyclone basins are welcome.
Scope of the journal includes:
• Reviews of tropical cyclones exhibiting unusual characteristics or behavior or resulting in disastrous impacts on Typhoon Committee Members and other regional WMO bodies
• Advances in applied and basic tropical cyclone research or technology to improve tropical cyclone forecasts and warnings
• Basic theoretical studies of tropical cyclones
• Event reports, compelling images, and topic review reports of tropical cyclones
• Impacts, risk assessments, and risk management techniques related to tropical cyclones