Evaluation of spinal deformity and its progression in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: A retrospective MRI study of 59 cases

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andreas Kramer , Jonathan Neuhoff , Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam , Rebecca Sutherland , Hugh McCaughan , Benjamin Davies , Ehab Shiban , Florian Ringel , Andreas K. Demetriades
{"title":"Evaluation of spinal deformity and its progression in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: A retrospective MRI study of 59 cases","authors":"Andreas Kramer ,&nbsp;Jonathan Neuhoff ,&nbsp;Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam ,&nbsp;Rebecca Sutherland ,&nbsp;Hugh McCaughan ,&nbsp;Benjamin Davies ,&nbsp;Ehab Shiban ,&nbsp;Florian Ringel ,&nbsp;Andreas K. Demetriades","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pyogenic spondylodiscitis management often remains conservative without surgical intervention, yet the risk of spinal deformity under such therapy is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>This study explores spinal deformity progression in conservatively treated patients and identifies predictive factors for deformity advancement.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohort design with radiological data analysis from 59 patients with conservatively treated pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Deformities were categorized into four progression types reflecting severity: Type 1 (progressive vertebral body edema/endplate erosion), Type 2 (Type 1 plus disc space collapse), Type 3 (vertebral body destruction/mild translation), and Type 4 (significant segmental kyphosis &gt;20°/severe translation).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 59 patients, 66% exhibited progressive deformity over a mean follow-up of 10.75 months. The distribution of deformity progression was: Type 1 in two cases (3%), Type 2 in seven cases (12%), Type 3 in 13 cases (22%), and Type 4 in 17 cases (29%). Progression of deformity included a 92% increase in cases with segmental kyphosis &gt;20°; and a 167% increase in cases with segmental translation. Risk factors for significant kyphosis included &gt;50% vertebral body erosive destruction (p &lt; 0.01) and the presence of an epidural abscess (p &lt; 0.05). Lumbar region involvement significantly reduced the likelihood of spinal fusion at follow-up (p &lt; 0.05). A paravertebral abscess was significantly associated with the presence of a fractured vertebrae at follow-up (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><div>This study underscores the importance of closely monitoring patients with conservatively managed pyogenic spondylodiscitis for progressive spinal deformity, and suggests considering early surgical intervention in cases with a high risk of progression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529425000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pyogenic spondylodiscitis management often remains conservative without surgical intervention, yet the risk of spinal deformity under such therapy is unclear.

Research question

This study explores spinal deformity progression in conservatively treated patients and identifies predictive factors for deformity advancement.

Material and methods

Retrospective cohort design with radiological data analysis from 59 patients with conservatively treated pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Deformities were categorized into four progression types reflecting severity: Type 1 (progressive vertebral body edema/endplate erosion), Type 2 (Type 1 plus disc space collapse), Type 3 (vertebral body destruction/mild translation), and Type 4 (significant segmental kyphosis >20°/severe translation).

Results

Among 59 patients, 66% exhibited progressive deformity over a mean follow-up of 10.75 months. The distribution of deformity progression was: Type 1 in two cases (3%), Type 2 in seven cases (12%), Type 3 in 13 cases (22%), and Type 4 in 17 cases (29%). Progression of deformity included a 92% increase in cases with segmental kyphosis >20°; and a 167% increase in cases with segmental translation. Risk factors for significant kyphosis included >50% vertebral body erosive destruction (p < 0.01) and the presence of an epidural abscess (p < 0.05). Lumbar region involvement significantly reduced the likelihood of spinal fusion at follow-up (p < 0.05). A paravertebral abscess was significantly associated with the presence of a fractured vertebrae at follow-up (p < 0.05).

Discussion and conclusion

This study underscores the importance of closely monitoring patients with conservatively managed pyogenic spondylodiscitis for progressive spinal deformity, and suggests considering early surgical intervention in cases with a high risk of progression.
59例化脓性脊柱炎脊柱畸形及其进展的回顾性MRI研究
化脓性脊柱炎的治疗通常是保守的,没有手术干预,但在这种治疗下脊柱畸形的风险尚不清楚。研究问题:本研究探讨了保守治疗患者脊柱畸形的进展,并确定了畸形进展的预测因素。材料和方法回顾性队列设计,并对59例保守治疗的化脓性脊柱炎患者的影像学资料进行分析。畸形根据严重程度分为四种进展类型:1型(进行性椎体水肿/终板侵蚀),2型(1型加椎间盘间隙塌陷),3型(椎体破坏/轻度平移),4型(显著节段性后凸>;20°/严重平移)。结果59例患者中,66%在平均10.75个月的随访中出现进行性畸形。畸形进展分布为:1型2例(3%),2型7例(12%),3型13例(22%),4型17例(29%)。畸形的进展包括:节段性后凸(20°)增加92%;分段翻译的案例增加了167%。严重后凸的危险因素包括50%椎体糜烂性破坏(p <;0.01)和硬膜外脓肿的存在(p <;0.05)。腰椎受援显著降低了随访时脊柱融合的可能性(p <;0.05)。椎骨旁脓肿与随访时椎骨骨折存在显著相关(p <;0.05)。讨论和结论本研究强调了密切监测保守治疗的化脓性脊柱炎患者进行性脊柱畸形的重要性,并建议对进展风险高的病例考虑早期手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信