Prevalence of mobile device use among healthcare providers in the operating theatres: Perceptions and distractions

Q2 Nursing
Betül Kocamer Şimşek, Yunus Baydilek, Soner Karadaş, Ahmet Aykut Akyılmaz
{"title":"Prevalence of mobile device use among healthcare providers in the operating theatres: Perceptions and distractions","authors":"Betül Kocamer Şimşek,&nbsp;Yunus Baydilek,&nbsp;Soner Karadaş,&nbsp;Ahmet Aykut Akyılmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.pcorm.2025.100474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Distractions in the operating theatre can significantly impair surgical performance and patient safety. This study investigates the various sources of distractions, particularly focusing on technological and non-technological factors, and their differential impact across various occupational roles within anesthesiology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 169 anes- thesiology professionals categorized into three groups: residents, technicians, and specialists. Data were collected via structured questionnaires, capturing both quantitative and qualitative aspects of workplace distractions. Statis- tical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Pearson's chi-square test, and multivariate analysis of covariance, adhering to STROBE guide- lines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multivariate analysis of covariance revealed significant occupational effects on distraction-related variables (Pillai's Trace = 0.323, F(32, 298) = 1.80, <em>p</em> = 0.007). Significant findings included higher levels of mobile phone use for texting, gaming, and media consumption among specialists compared to other groups. Texting on the phone (F(2, 163) = 6.37, <em>p</em> = 0.002), playing games on phone (F(2, 163) = 8.39, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and watching movies/series on phone (F(2, 163) = 4.15, <em>p</em> = 0.018) were notably higher among specialists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study highlights the need for comprehensive inter- ventions to mitigate the effects of distractions in surgical environments, in- cluding policy formulation for mobile device usage and strategies to improve team dynamics and environmental conditions. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and explore the broader implications across different healthcare settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53468,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405603025000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Distractions in the operating theatre can significantly impair surgical performance and patient safety. This study investigates the various sources of distractions, particularly focusing on technological and non-technological factors, and their differential impact across various occupational roles within anesthesiology.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 169 anes- thesiology professionals categorized into three groups: residents, technicians, and specialists. Data were collected via structured questionnaires, capturing both quantitative and qualitative aspects of workplace distractions. Statis- tical analysis included ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Pearson's chi-square test, and multivariate analysis of covariance, adhering to STROBE guide- lines.

Results

The multivariate analysis of covariance revealed significant occupational effects on distraction-related variables (Pillai's Trace = 0.323, F(32, 298) = 1.80, p = 0.007). Significant findings included higher levels of mobile phone use for texting, gaming, and media consumption among specialists compared to other groups. Texting on the phone (F(2, 163) = 6.37, p = 0.002), playing games on phone (F(2, 163) = 8.39, p < 0.001), and watching movies/series on phone (F(2, 163) = 4.15, p = 0.018) were notably higher among specialists.

Conclusion

The study highlights the need for comprehensive inter- ventions to mitigate the effects of distractions in surgical environments, in- cluding policy formulation for mobile device usage and strategies to improve team dynamics and environmental conditions. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and explore the broader implications across different healthcare settings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management
Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The objective of this new online journal is to serve as a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed source of information related to the administrative, economic, operational, safety, and quality aspects of the ambulatory and in-patient operating room and interventional procedural processes. The journal will provide high-quality information and research findings on operational and system-based approaches to ensure safe, coordinated, and high-value periprocedural care. With the current focus on value in health care it is essential that there is a venue for researchers to publish articles on quality improvement process initiatives, process flow modeling, information management, efficient design, cost improvement, use of novel technologies, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信