Influence of perceptions of organizations and perceptions of issues on communicative behaviors: Roles of conspiratorial thinking and responsibility attribution
{"title":"Influence of perceptions of organizations and perceptions of issues on communicative behaviors: Roles of conspiratorial thinking and responsibility attribution","authors":"Lisa Tam , Soojin Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A few research studies in public relations have identified significant associations between relational and situational variables in the context of a specific issue involving an organization. Despite this, no research to date has explained why and how these associations occur. Therefore, this study tests the roles of conspiratorial thinking and responsibility attribution in influencing the confluence of publics’ perceptions of an organization with their perceptions about an issue involving the organization. Situating the study in the context of the Australian Government and the issue of high-rise overdevelopment, an online survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 400 Australian citizens. The results showed that publics with high levels of distrust and political cynicism toward the government also reported high conspiratorial thinking about the government. Conspiratorial thinking was significantly associated with responsibility attribution to the government for causing the issue of high-rise overdevelopment. Subsequently, publics developed situational perceptions and motivations about the issue. The findings showed that even if individuals attribute responsibility to the government for causing an issue, as long as they have high situational activeness in the issue, they will engage in proactive communicative behaviors to seek, forefend and forward information from the government. (196 words)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 102543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A few research studies in public relations have identified significant associations between relational and situational variables in the context of a specific issue involving an organization. Despite this, no research to date has explained why and how these associations occur. Therefore, this study tests the roles of conspiratorial thinking and responsibility attribution in influencing the confluence of publics’ perceptions of an organization with their perceptions about an issue involving the organization. Situating the study in the context of the Australian Government and the issue of high-rise overdevelopment, an online survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 400 Australian citizens. The results showed that publics with high levels of distrust and political cynicism toward the government also reported high conspiratorial thinking about the government. Conspiratorial thinking was significantly associated with responsibility attribution to the government for causing the issue of high-rise overdevelopment. Subsequently, publics developed situational perceptions and motivations about the issue. The findings showed that even if individuals attribute responsibility to the government for causing an issue, as long as they have high situational activeness in the issue, they will engage in proactive communicative behaviors to seek, forefend and forward information from the government. (196 words)
期刊介绍:
The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.