Artificial reproductive technologies (ART), a reproductive physician’s standpoint

Q3 Medicine
J-F. Guérin
{"title":"Artificial reproductive technologies (ART), a reproductive physician’s standpoint","authors":"J-F. Guérin","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>History.- Inseminations with donor sperm have represented the first medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technique. In France, sperm banks gathered rapidly and constituted the “Federation of CECOS”. Three fundamental principles were defined relating to sperm donation: volunteering, gratuity, and anonymity. The rapid development of in vitro fertilization and embryo cryopreservation encouraged the French government to publish in 1994 the first bioethical law, that was supposed to be revised every 5 years.</div><div>New modalities of MAR introduced by the law of 2 August 2021.- MAR that were initially reserved to heterosexual couples, are now open to female couples and unmarried women, thus clarifying a situation that already existed in practice. Literature indicates that there are no major difficulties in children raised by female couples, however there are more concerns about single women. From a practical point of view, this extension of MAR leads to a significant influx of requests, with longer waiting times. Lifting the anonymity of gamete donation raises some problems as destruction of old sperm straws and possible solicitation of former donors who wanted to remain anonymous. Finally, from a medical standpoint, it must be stressed that self-preservation of oocytes will not constitute a guarantee for women to have a child later.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352552525000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History.- Inseminations with donor sperm have represented the first medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technique. In France, sperm banks gathered rapidly and constituted the “Federation of CECOS”. Three fundamental principles were defined relating to sperm donation: volunteering, gratuity, and anonymity. The rapid development of in vitro fertilization and embryo cryopreservation encouraged the French government to publish in 1994 the first bioethical law, that was supposed to be revised every 5 years.
New modalities of MAR introduced by the law of 2 August 2021.- MAR that were initially reserved to heterosexual couples, are now open to female couples and unmarried women, thus clarifying a situation that already existed in practice. Literature indicates that there are no major difficulties in children raised by female couples, however there are more concerns about single women. From a practical point of view, this extension of MAR leads to a significant influx of requests, with longer waiting times. Lifting the anonymity of gamete donation raises some problems as destruction of old sperm straws and possible solicitation of former donors who wanted to remain anonymous. Finally, from a medical standpoint, it must be stressed that self-preservation of oocytes will not constitute a guarantee for women to have a child later.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信