Gender disparities in job flexibility, job security, psychological distress, work absenteeism, and work presenteeism among U.S. adults

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Monica L. Wang , Marie-Rachelle Narcisse , Kate Rodriguez , Pearl A. McElfish
{"title":"Gender disparities in job flexibility, job security, psychological distress, work absenteeism, and work presenteeism among U.S. adults","authors":"Monica L. Wang ,&nbsp;Marie-Rachelle Narcisse ,&nbsp;Kate Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Pearl A. McElfish","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While international research has examined the relationship between job characteristics and mental health, including gender differences, few studies have assessed these associations at the national level in the U.S., which has unique labor markets, health care systems, and societal structures that may exacerbate gender disparities. This study investigates gender differences in the associations between job flexibility, job security, mental health outcomes, work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and mental health care utilization among a representative sample of working U.S. adults.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed cross-sectional population-based survey data from employed adults in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Job characteristics included perceived job flexibility and security. Outcomes included serious psychological distress, frequency of anxiety, work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and mental health care utilization. Multivariable logistic and binomial regression analyses examined associations of interest, with statistical interaction tests conducted to assess gender differences.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The study sample included 18,112 respondents weighted to represent a population of 168,068,586 civilian, non-institutionalized working U.S. adults (47.7% female). Females with low job security had a decreased probability of serious psychological distress than males with low job security (F<sub>(3,589)</sub> = 2.79; <em>p</em> = 0.040). Females with the lowest job flexibility reported more days worked while ill than males over the past 3 months, while males with higher job flexibility reported more days worked while ill than females (F<sub>(3,589)</sub> = 4.1; <em>p</em> = 0.007). The average number of work days missed over 12 months was lower among females than males when job security was perceived as fairly low and higher among females than males as job security increased (F<sub>(3,589)</sub> = 4.3; <em>p</em> = 0.005).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Findings highlight the need for policies and practices that recognize and address gender-specific workforce experiences and needs. Tailored interventions that enhance job flexibility and security, support caregiving responsibilities, and provide comprehensive mental health services can address such challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While international research has examined the relationship between job characteristics and mental health, including gender differences, few studies have assessed these associations at the national level in the U.S., which has unique labor markets, health care systems, and societal structures that may exacerbate gender disparities. This study investigates gender differences in the associations between job flexibility, job security, mental health outcomes, work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and mental health care utilization among a representative sample of working U.S. adults.

Methods

We analyzed cross-sectional population-based survey data from employed adults in the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Job characteristics included perceived job flexibility and security. Outcomes included serious psychological distress, frequency of anxiety, work absenteeism, work presenteeism, and mental health care utilization. Multivariable logistic and binomial regression analyses examined associations of interest, with statistical interaction tests conducted to assess gender differences.

Findings

The study sample included 18,112 respondents weighted to represent a population of 168,068,586 civilian, non-institutionalized working U.S. adults (47.7% female). Females with low job security had a decreased probability of serious psychological distress than males with low job security (F(3,589) = 2.79; p = 0.040). Females with the lowest job flexibility reported more days worked while ill than males over the past 3 months, while males with higher job flexibility reported more days worked while ill than females (F(3,589) = 4.1; p = 0.007). The average number of work days missed over 12 months was lower among females than males when job security was perceived as fairly low and higher among females than males as job security increased (F(3,589) = 4.3; p = 0.005).

Interpretation

Findings highlight the need for policies and practices that recognize and address gender-specific workforce experiences and needs. Tailored interventions that enhance job flexibility and security, support caregiving responsibilities, and provide comprehensive mental health services can address such challenges.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ssm-Population Health
Ssm-Population Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
298
审稿时长
101 days
期刊介绍: SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信