Nature’s role in residential development: Identifying leverage points for climate change planning in Ontario, Canada

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Adam Skoyles , Michael Drescher , Dawn C. Parker , Derek T. Robinson
{"title":"Nature’s role in residential development: Identifying leverage points for climate change planning in Ontario, Canada","authors":"Adam Skoyles ,&nbsp;Michael Drescher ,&nbsp;Dawn C. Parker ,&nbsp;Derek T. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities are establishing climate change related targets to mitigate the effects of climate change and adapt to its consequences. Natural features, such as trees and wetlands, can help communities reach their mitigation goals by storing carbon while also providing co-benefits that build resilience to climate change impacts. However, nature-based solutions for addressing climate change are not widely recognized in current development practices. To better understand this limitation, we interviewed nine municipal planners and eight private developers across Ontario, Canada, to assess how stakeholders in residential development consider natural features and climate change in their decisions. Our findings demonstrate that natural features, particularly in the natural heritage system, receive substantial attention in residential development decisions, but that climate change is rarely an explicit factor in those decisions. We anticipate that if the climate change benefits of natural features were explicitly quantified, this could impact the decisions of key stakeholders and support the design of alternative development forms. Our findings also suggest that policy changes, green development standards, cross-sector collaboration, and reliable ecosystem services data could all serve as significant leverage points for communities to support the implementation of nature-based solutions for climate change. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of green development standards and how tools that quantify ecosystem services could be incorporated into the development process to identify effective pathways for implementing nature-based solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 128714"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725000482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities are establishing climate change related targets to mitigate the effects of climate change and adapt to its consequences. Natural features, such as trees and wetlands, can help communities reach their mitigation goals by storing carbon while also providing co-benefits that build resilience to climate change impacts. However, nature-based solutions for addressing climate change are not widely recognized in current development practices. To better understand this limitation, we interviewed nine municipal planners and eight private developers across Ontario, Canada, to assess how stakeholders in residential development consider natural features and climate change in their decisions. Our findings demonstrate that natural features, particularly in the natural heritage system, receive substantial attention in residential development decisions, but that climate change is rarely an explicit factor in those decisions. We anticipate that if the climate change benefits of natural features were explicitly quantified, this could impact the decisions of key stakeholders and support the design of alternative development forms. Our findings also suggest that policy changes, green development standards, cross-sector collaboration, and reliable ecosystem services data could all serve as significant leverage points for communities to support the implementation of nature-based solutions for climate change. Future research should investigate the effectiveness of green development standards and how tools that quantify ecosystem services could be incorporated into the development process to identify effective pathways for implementing nature-based solutions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信