Evaluating financial implications of renewable energy for climate action and sustainable development goals

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yasir Ahmed Solangi , Cosimo Magazzino
{"title":"Evaluating financial implications of renewable energy for climate action and sustainable development goals","authors":"Yasir Ahmed Solangi ,&nbsp;Cosimo Magazzino","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global issue is the urgent need to shift to renewable energy sources to mitigate climate change and sustainable development. China, as the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter, is under increasing pressure to transition to renewable energy sources to meet global climate targets, including its commitment to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. This shift is necessary to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (Affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (Climate action). Adopting renewable energy presents a number of significant challenges. Therefore, assessing the financial impact of renewable energy adoption is essential for driving climate action and achieving SDGs. This study identified six criteria, twenty-four sub-criteria, and six financial policy strategies for renewable energy development. This study employs fuzzy-based multi-criteria decision-making methods, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR), to analyze and prioritize key criteria and policy strategies in addressing the financial complexities of China's renewable energy transition. The findings of fuzzy AHP highlight financial risk, social benefits, and economic viability as crucial criteria in evaluating the financial implications of renewable energy adoption in China. Besides, the results of fuzzy VIKOR indicate that subsidies and grants, green finance initiatives, and public-private partnerships are the most significant financial policy strategies. This research provides direction for policymakers, investors, and industry stakeholders aiming to align financial sustainability to ensure a sustainable and resilient energy future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115390"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global issue is the urgent need to shift to renewable energy sources to mitigate climate change and sustainable development. China, as the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter, is under increasing pressure to transition to renewable energy sources to meet global climate targets, including its commitment to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060. This shift is necessary to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (Affordable and clean energy) and SDG 13 (Climate action). Adopting renewable energy presents a number of significant challenges. Therefore, assessing the financial impact of renewable energy adoption is essential for driving climate action and achieving SDGs. This study identified six criteria, twenty-four sub-criteria, and six financial policy strategies for renewable energy development. This study employs fuzzy-based multi-criteria decision-making methods, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and VIekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR), to analyze and prioritize key criteria and policy strategies in addressing the financial complexities of China's renewable energy transition. The findings of fuzzy AHP highlight financial risk, social benefits, and economic viability as crucial criteria in evaluating the financial implications of renewable energy adoption in China. Besides, the results of fuzzy VIKOR indicate that subsidies and grants, green finance initiatives, and public-private partnerships are the most significant financial policy strategies. This research provides direction for policymakers, investors, and industry stakeholders aiming to align financial sustainability to ensure a sustainable and resilient energy future.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信