Role and trends of flexibility options in 100% renewable energy system analyses towards the Power-to-X Economy

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Siavash Khalili, Gabriel Lopez, Christian Breyer
{"title":"Role and trends of flexibility options in 100% renewable energy system analyses towards the Power-to-X Economy","authors":"Siavash Khalili,&nbsp;Gabriel Lopez,&nbsp;Christian Breyer","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flexibility options are essential components in highly renewable energy systems due to the inherent variability of renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaics and wind power. The adoption of renewable energy aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7, ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. This study investigates the impact of flexibility alternatives within the framework of 100% renewable energy systems through a systematic literature review to identify energy system analyses of at least 95% renewable energy supply for at least one sector in at least one scenario. 1067 articles from 1975 to 2023 were analysed to understand the functionality of flexibility options in highly renewable energy systems. The identified flexibility options include power-to-X, energy storage, demand response, power grids, and curtailment. The results indicate that within the field of 100% renewable energy systems, electricity-based solutions have emerged as the default. Various electricity-based fuels are used, with e-hydrogen and e-methane being the most widely discussed in 46% and 19% of articles, followed by Fischer-Tropsch and e-methanol with 3% of studies, respectively. Battery storage is covered by 60% of articles, followed by e-fuels options, and pumped hydro energy storage. Demand response was identified as the least included method. 46% of the articles highlight the role of transmission grids and 25% include curtailment. Early 100% renewable energy system analyses focused on flexibility in the power sector, whereas the shift of studies to a Power-to-X Economy has broadened research to flexibility options across the entire energy-industry system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115383"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000565","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexibility options are essential components in highly renewable energy systems due to the inherent variability of renewable energy sources, such as solar photovoltaics and wind power. The adoption of renewable energy aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 7, ensuring access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. This study investigates the impact of flexibility alternatives within the framework of 100% renewable energy systems through a systematic literature review to identify energy system analyses of at least 95% renewable energy supply for at least one sector in at least one scenario. 1067 articles from 1975 to 2023 were analysed to understand the functionality of flexibility options in highly renewable energy systems. The identified flexibility options include power-to-X, energy storage, demand response, power grids, and curtailment. The results indicate that within the field of 100% renewable energy systems, electricity-based solutions have emerged as the default. Various electricity-based fuels are used, with e-hydrogen and e-methane being the most widely discussed in 46% and 19% of articles, followed by Fischer-Tropsch and e-methanol with 3% of studies, respectively. Battery storage is covered by 60% of articles, followed by e-fuels options, and pumped hydro energy storage. Demand response was identified as the least included method. 46% of the articles highlight the role of transmission grids and 25% include curtailment. Early 100% renewable energy system analyses focused on flexibility in the power sector, whereas the shift of studies to a Power-to-X Economy has broadened research to flexibility options across the entire energy-industry system.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信