Scenarios of sustainable energy transition towards the decarbonisation of the road transport sector: A case study for Mexico

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
S.I. Vallarta-Serrano , E. Santoyo-Castelazo , E. Santoyo , R.A. Ramirez-Mendoza , R. Bustamante-Bello , L. Beltrán-Rodríguez
{"title":"Scenarios of sustainable energy transition towards the decarbonisation of the road transport sector: A case study for Mexico","authors":"S.I. Vallarta-Serrano ,&nbsp;E. Santoyo-Castelazo ,&nbsp;E. Santoyo ,&nbsp;R.A. Ramirez-Mendoza ,&nbsp;R. Bustamante-Bello ,&nbsp;L. Beltrán-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Worldwide, the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels in the road transport sector is a climate change mitigation priority. This study provides an integrated assessment methodology applied to a case study of Mexico to propose sustainable energy transition alternatives for the long-term decarbonisation of the national sector. Energy modelling and scenario development methods to obtain holistic alternatives for the transition of this sector were conducted. Six scenarios were proposed to describe the energy consumption and the main CO<sub>2</sub> trajectories considering environmental, socio-economic, technological, and governance aspects. The scenarios follow different pathways, from a Business-as-usual to a Net Zero, which were statistically analysed and validated. From 2018 to 2050, when a population of 144 million inhabitants is expected in the country, the first scenario leads to a 73.7 % increase in fossil energy consumption and 71.6 % in carbon emissions, whereas the Net Zero scenario suggests a possible reduction of 42.3 % and 89.9 %, respectively. In this scenario, the largest reductions in carbon emissions may be attained by fuel diversification, with electricity contributing 73.9 %, biofuels 9.2 %, hydrogen 8.2 %, less than 1 % of synthetic fuels and fossil fuels 8.7 %. Achieving decarbonisation targets would depend on: (i) a reduction in fossil fuels and energy demand; (ii) a gradual introduction of clean energy sources for low-carbon power generation; (iii) a societal behavioural change; (iv) a large investment in infrastructure, and (v) the updating of public policies to support a sustainable energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 115341"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125000140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels in the road transport sector is a climate change mitigation priority. This study provides an integrated assessment methodology applied to a case study of Mexico to propose sustainable energy transition alternatives for the long-term decarbonisation of the national sector. Energy modelling and scenario development methods to obtain holistic alternatives for the transition of this sector were conducted. Six scenarios were proposed to describe the energy consumption and the main CO2 trajectories considering environmental, socio-economic, technological, and governance aspects. The scenarios follow different pathways, from a Business-as-usual to a Net Zero, which were statistically analysed and validated. From 2018 to 2050, when a population of 144 million inhabitants is expected in the country, the first scenario leads to a 73.7 % increase in fossil energy consumption and 71.6 % in carbon emissions, whereas the Net Zero scenario suggests a possible reduction of 42.3 % and 89.9 %, respectively. In this scenario, the largest reductions in carbon emissions may be attained by fuel diversification, with electricity contributing 73.9 %, biofuels 9.2 %, hydrogen 8.2 %, less than 1 % of synthetic fuels and fossil fuels 8.7 %. Achieving decarbonisation targets would depend on: (i) a reduction in fossil fuels and energy demand; (ii) a gradual introduction of clean energy sources for low-carbon power generation; (iii) a societal behavioural change; (iv) a large investment in infrastructure, and (v) the updating of public policies to support a sustainable energy transition.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信